Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design
DOI: 10.1109/iwssd.1998.667919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling system requirements and runtime behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring infrastructure A monitoring infrastructure is required to continuously observe and analyze emitted events to check compliance. Runtime requirementsmonitoring systems, such as proposed by Feather et al [10] and Skene and Emmerich [3], can be integrated with MORSE and used for the compliance checking. If a violation occurs, the model responsible for the violation can easily be identified using the identifier contained in the event(s) that caused the violation.…”
Section: A Model-aware Service Environment In Compliance Monitoring Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monitoring infrastructure A monitoring infrastructure is required to continuously observe and analyze emitted events to check compliance. Runtime requirementsmonitoring systems, such as proposed by Feather et al [10] and Skene and Emmerich [3], can be integrated with MORSE and used for the compliance checking. If a violation occurs, the model responsible for the violation can easily be identified using the identifier contained in the event(s) that caused the violation.…”
Section: A Model-aware Service Environment In Compliance Monitoring Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we refer and relate to work in the areas of runtime requirements-monitoring and model management in form of model repositories. 36 x + 3.38 Feather et al [10] discuss an architecture and a development process for monitoring system requirements at runtime. It builds on work on goal-driven requirements engineering [21] and runtime requirements monitoring [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feather et al [2] address system behaviour deviations from requirements specifications; they introduce an architecture (and a development process) to reconcile requirements with behaviour. This process is enacted by jointly anticipating deviations at specification time and solving unpredicted situations at runtime, and examine the latter option using the requirements monitoring framework FLEA [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations of system behavior from requirements specifications have been discussed in [2], where the authors suggest an architecture (and a development process) to reconcile requirements with system behavior. Reconciliation is enacted by anticipating deviations at specification time and solving unpredicted circumstances at runtime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a change in stakeholder requirements is detected at runtime (e.g., by using the approach in [2]), goal models can be used to re-evaluate the system behaviour alternatives with respect to the new requirements and to determine if system reconfiguration is needed. For instance, if a change in stakeholder requirements affected a particular goal in the model, it is easy to see how this goal is decomposed and which components/autonomic elements implementing the goal are in turn affected.…”
Section: The Role Of Goal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%