2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling strong slab pull and weak plate bending: The plate motion constraint on the strength of mantle slabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
119
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
17
119
1
Order By: Relevance
“…68 Ma, for averaged effective viscosity ratios of 500 and 200, respectively). This idea of a relatively weak slab is consistent with studies on plate strength and fl exural rigidity by using topographygravity admittance (Billen and Gurnis, 2005) and arguments about subductability of purely viscous slabs (Conrad and Hager, 1999;Becker et al, 1999;Funiciello et al, 2008) and global plate mobility (Wu et al, 2008) as constrained by numerical and laboratory modeling results integrated with natural data. However, there is a discrepancy with respect to the lower value and the extremely weak slab viscosity (less than 10 22 ) predicted by geopotential, dynamic topography and in-slab force transmission (Hager, 1984;Zhong and Davies, 1999;Billen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…68 Ma, for averaged effective viscosity ratios of 500 and 200, respectively). This idea of a relatively weak slab is consistent with studies on plate strength and fl exural rigidity by using topographygravity admittance (Billen and Gurnis, 2005) and arguments about subductability of purely viscous slabs (Conrad and Hager, 1999;Becker et al, 1999;Funiciello et al, 2008) and global plate mobility (Wu et al, 2008) as constrained by numerical and laboratory modeling results integrated with natural data. However, there is a discrepancy with respect to the lower value and the extremely weak slab viscosity (less than 10 22 ) predicted by geopotential, dynamic topography and in-slab force transmission (Hager, 1984;Zhong and Davies, 1999;Billen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Viscosity of the overriding lithosphere, when present, is 2.9 × 10 4 Pa s and the viscosity of the mantle ranges between 30 and 40 Pa s. The obtained viscosity ratio between the slab and the upper mantle varies between 7.75×10 2 and 25×10 2 (Table 1), which is in the high range of proposed values (e.g. Billen et al, 2003;Faccenna et al, 2007;Funiciello et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2008;Loiselet et al, 2009Loiselet et al, , 2010. In the following, we directly express the quantities with their corresponding scaled values for a better relevance to real Earth.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previous work has argued that the upper mantle is dominantly non-Newtonian and strain rate softening [Billen, 2008;Cizkova and Bina, 2013], which implies that the effective viscosity ratio between a slab and the ambient upper mantle should be relatively high. Nevertheless, the effective viscosity ratio that we use in our experiments (~160) is well within the previous estimates of approximately 50-500 [e.g., Schellart, 2008;Funiciello et al, 2008;Ribe, 2010;Wu et al, 2008;Loiselet et al, 2009;Li and Ribe, 2012]. For the density difference we consider a natural upper limit of Δρ = 80 kg m 3 , which would correspond to an old lithospheric slab in which all the oceanic crust has been altered to eclogite and with no heat diffusion into the slab.…”
Section: 1002/2014gl062876mentioning
confidence: 80%