Reconciling Medical Expenditure Estimates from the MEPS and NHEA, 2007

Abstract

Objective: Provide a comparison of health care expenditure estimates for 2007 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA). Reconciling these estimates serves two important purposes. First, it is an important quality assurance exercise for improving and ensuring the integrity of each source's estimates. Second, the reconciliation provides a consistent baseline of health expenditure data for policy simulations. Our results assist researchers to adjust MEPS to be consistent with the NHEA so that the projected costs as well as budgetary and tax implications of any policy change are consistent with national health spending estimates. Data Sources: Results:In this study, we focus on the personal health care (PHC) sector, which includes the goods and services rendered to treat or prevent a specific disease or condition in an individual. The official 2007 NHEA estimate for PHC spending is $1,915 billion and the MEPS estimate is $1,126 billion. Adjusting the NHEA estimates for differences in underlying populations, covered services, and other measurement concepts reduces the NHEA estimate for 2007 to $1,366 billion. As a result, MEPS is $240 billion, or 17.6 percent, less than the adjusted NHEA total.

Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States

“…Indicator, which was also used for previous chartbooks. 6,16,21 In contrast with the previous chartbook, we did not group 18 and we highlight them so that readers interpret our results with caution.…”

Preventing Obesity in the USA: Impact on Health Service Utilization and Costs

“…Recall error or imperfect understanding of key questions may mean that some entries may not accurately reflect reality; this may affect the results of this study. For example, other analyses have found that MEPS data tend to underestimate total medical expenditure by about 18 % [47]. This limitation of the dataset would lead to a likely underestimation of the actual cost savings associated with the implementation of primary prevention policies in the USA.…”

An Estimated $84.9 Billion In Uncompensated Care Was Provided In 2013; ACA Payment Cuts Could Challenge Providers

“…First, we adjusted for the acknowledged level of expenditure differences between MEPS and National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) data, which are widely viewed as a full accounting of national health care expenditures. 7,8 Based on work by Merrile Sing and coauthors, 7 we also inflated expenditures in MEPS by payer category (private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, and other) to more accurately represent aggregate US medical expenditures as presented in the NHEA. 9 To project uncompensated care costs for 2013, we made two additional adjustments.…”