2000
DOI: 10.1006/jvci.1999.0439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling Distance Functions and Level Sets

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the simulation of the partial differential equation driven evolution of a closed surface by means of an implicit representation. In most applications, the natural choice for the implicit representation is the signed distance function to the closed surface. Osher and Sethian have proposed to evolve the distance function with a Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Unfortunately the solution to this equation is not a distance function. As a consequence, the practical application of the level set… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One popular solution consists of the re-initialization of the volumetric function [33,34], which is used for locally re-distancing the level sets without affecting the motion of the zero level set. An interesting alternative was proposed by Gomes and Faugeras [35], who defined a different implementation of the Hamilton-Jacobi PDE that inherently preserves the distance function.…”
Section: Volumetric Functions In Level-set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular solution consists of the re-initialization of the volumetric function [33,34], which is used for locally re-distancing the level sets without affecting the motion of the zero level set. An interesting alternative was proposed by Gomes and Faugeras [35], who defined a different implementation of the Hamilton-Jacobi PDE that inherently preserves the distance function.…”
Section: Volumetric Functions In Level-set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of valid signed-distance functions forms a nonlinear space but its geometry is seldom utilized to keep representations valid [45]. Since this method is not based on a Riemannian metric, it does not naturally provide geodesic paths on shape spaces of curves.…”
Section: Other Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) is extended to the ROI using the method proposed by Gomes and Faugeras. 8 The extension of the speed function makes the algorithm focus on the movement of the initial contours, and therefore it avoids the possible inner boundaries when the appearance of the bladder wall is affected. The mean intensity value of the internal region is fixed in order to make the segmentation more reliable and less dynamic; as sometimes, the perivesical fats that are near the bladder wall have similar appearances to the bladder wall itself due to the partial volume effect, they become included in the outer boundary based on their large intensity contrasts to the high-signal intensity background.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the Outer Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%