2018
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling cosmic ray diffusion with Galactic magnetic field models

Abstract: We calculate the diffusion coefficients of charged cosmic rays (CR) propagating in regular and turbulent magnetic fields. If the magnetic field is dominated by an isotropic turbulent component, we find that CRs reside too long in the Galactic disc. As a result, CRs overproduce secondary nuclei like boron for any reasonable values of the strength and the coherence length of an isotropic turbulent field. We conclude therefore that the propagation of Galactic CRs has to be strongly anisotropic because of a suffic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the number of contributing sources is reduced by a factor 100 as argued in Ref. [150], only few sources may be responsible for the locally observed CR flux above 200 GeV. In this scenario, one expects also at lower energies a reduced number of sources contributing which should manifest itself by additional small breaks in the primary spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the number of contributing sources is reduced by a factor 100 as argued in Ref. [150], only few sources may be responsible for the locally observed CR flux above 200 GeV. In this scenario, one expects also at lower energies a reduced number of sources contributing which should manifest itself by additional small breaks in the primary spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In Refs. [93,150], it was found that L 0 L c /(2π) provides a good fit to their numerical results. The presence of the factor 1/(2π) becomes evident recalling that we compare in Eq.…”
Section: Sources Of Crsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, some of the simulations above did not incorporate potentially-critical CR physics: ignoring CR losses (so CRs have essentially "infinite" energy/cooling times), treating only CR streaming or diffusion, ignoring magnetic fields (which can confine the CRs and regulate their transport), or (for numerical timestep reasons) using artificially low CR diffusion coefficients 2 κ 10 29 cm 2 s −1 , which artificially confines CRs near galaxies (generating stronger effects there) but violates observational constraints from spallation in the MW and γ-ray emission in nearby galaxies (see Lacki et al 2011;Cummings et al 2016;Jóhannesson et al 2016;Korsmeier & Cuoco 2016;Guo et al 2016;Fu et al 2017;Lopez et al 2018;Chan et al 2018;Giacinti et al 2018). It is therefore critical to study the effects of CRs in fully-cosmological simulations, which attempt to directly treat the multi-phase ISM and mechanical/radiative (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To distinguish them from DM explanation is certainly important task [28] and it is in progress. Also specifics of possible anisotropy of CR propagation in galactic magnetic fields [29,30] may effectively shorten CR travelling length. So CR puzzles could be explained [31][32][33]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%