2017
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling Competence and Consent in Opioid-Dependence Research: The Value of Vulnerability Rhetoric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of PWUO to provide informed consent to drug trials has been debated. Although some researchers think PWUO may not be able to provide informed consent due to the belief that addictions control thoughts and behaviors (Afolabi & Sodeke, 2017), others believe that PWUO have the capacity to give informed consent until there is a finding of incapacity (Huang & Wasserman, 2017). Further, assertions that iOAT is an effective medical treatment have attempted to quell concerns about voluntary informed consent and reflects the need to view iOAT as a lifesaving measure for many PWUO who use illicit opioids rather than an ethical debate (Steel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theme 4: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of PWUO to provide informed consent to drug trials has been debated. Although some researchers think PWUO may not be able to provide informed consent due to the belief that addictions control thoughts and behaviors (Afolabi & Sodeke, 2017), others believe that PWUO have the capacity to give informed consent until there is a finding of incapacity (Huang & Wasserman, 2017). Further, assertions that iOAT is an effective medical treatment have attempted to quell concerns about voluntary informed consent and reflects the need to view iOAT as a lifesaving measure for many PWUO who use illicit opioids rather than an ethical debate (Steel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Theme 4: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced the SMARPP workbook and used it to conceptualize laxative abuse as an addiction. We chose this approach because at the heart of the phenomenon of addiction is the erosion of the desire to refrain from harmful behavior, which is caused by neuroplastic changes in the brain that limit the rational control of such harmful behavior [10]. A clinical examination of the attitude of a patient with AN toward laxative abuse in light of DSM supported our approach.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%