2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011ja017020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciliation of rocket‐based magnetic field measurements in the equatorial electrojet with classical collision theory

Abstract: [1] We provide an explanation for a long-standing (more than 35 years) discrepancy between theory and rocket experiments concerning the peak height of the electrojet current and the magnitude of magnetic field perturbation. The arbitrary correction of the electron-neutral collision frequency by a factor of 4, which has been used to explain these problems, is not necessary if the field line-integrated conductivities are used. Recent research using ground-based magnetometers and CHAMP have also used this constan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rapid rise in the conductivity marks the sunrise, which is followed by the daytime increase in its values that peak at midday (UT−3). In its height variation the C peaks in the region of 105-107 km, which is in accordance with results from many observational and theoretical studies (Richmond, 1973;Haerendel and Eccles, 1992;Kelley et al, 2012). In the right panels, where the time variation of the solar flux is considered, we can clearly note the sensibility of the integrated Cowling conductivity to small changes in the EUV flux variation.…”
Section: Modeling Results By Supim-inpesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A rapid rise in the conductivity marks the sunrise, which is followed by the daytime increase in its values that peak at midday (UT−3). In its height variation the C peaks in the region of 105-107 km, which is in accordance with results from many observational and theoretical studies (Richmond, 1973;Haerendel and Eccles, 1992;Kelley et al, 2012). In the right panels, where the time variation of the solar flux is considered, we can clearly note the sensibility of the integrated Cowling conductivity to small changes in the EUV flux variation.…”
Section: Modeling Results By Supim-inpesupporting
confidence: 73%