2019
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2017.1497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing What and How Women Negotiate for Career Advancement

Abstract: We propose a conceptual framework for expanding the scope of future research on the role of gender in career negotiations. Extant research on gender in career negotiations emphasizes women's disadvantages relative to men in compensation negotiations. We present an inductive study of what and how women negotiate for career advancement and the attainment of leadership positions in organizations, drawing on data from diverse samples of negotiation accounts by senior-executive, mid-level, and early-career professi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender role expectations shape actors’ and their contacts’ beliefs about the resources men and women actors (should) desire, seek, and receive. Men actors tend to use their network for strategic resources, which directly and quickly benefit their careers (e.g., increased visibility, promotions, compensation, endorsements, introductions to valuable contacts; Bowles, Thomason, & Bear, 2019; Khattab et al, 2020). Alternatively, women may be more likely to seek resources that benefit their career success more slowly and indirectly.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Understanding Network-based Gender mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gender role expectations shape actors’ and their contacts’ beliefs about the resources men and women actors (should) desire, seek, and receive. Men actors tend to use their network for strategic resources, which directly and quickly benefit their careers (e.g., increased visibility, promotions, compensation, endorsements, introductions to valuable contacts; Bowles, Thomason, & Bear, 2019; Khattab et al, 2020). Alternatively, women may be more likely to seek resources that benefit their career success more slowly and indirectly.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Understanding Network-based Gender mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, men actors are less likely to request resources that undermine an “image of competence” (e.g., help, advice, feedback; Lim, Tai, Bamberger, & Morrison, 2020) or risk backlash for not being “man enough” (e.g., flexible work arrangements; Berdahl & Moon, 2013). In contrast, women actors are more likely to seek information about how to navigate workplace obstacles (e.g., discrimination, sexual harassment, work-family conflict; Bowles et al, 2019). Women actors may also feel more comfortable using their networks to gain resources that benefit their development and job performance (Lim et al, 2020) or their workgroup and coworkers (Amanatullah & Morris, 2010).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Understanding Network-based Gender mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose that WFC will be positively related to job promotions because working mothers experiencing higher WFC are more invested in the work role and thus are more likely to be promoted. Indeed, research suggests that WFC can actually facilitate rather than hinder job promotions (Bowles, Thomason, & Bear, 2019). This is consistent with a study by Martins, Eddleston, and Veiga (2002), in which WFC and job promotions were positively correlated.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are Women Less Likely to Ask than Men Partly Because They Work Fewer Hours? A Commentary on Artz et al (2018) Gender differences are a "hot" topic in negotiation research (e.g., Bowles et al, 2019;Small et al, 2007). This is because gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations as well as in negotiation behaviors and performance may help to account for longstanding inequalities (i.e., gender gaps in pay and top leadership positions; Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS], 2019a; Catalyst, 2020;Kulik & Olekalns, 2012;Stuhlmacher & Walters, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%