2019
DOI: 10.1111/psj.12319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing the Policy Subsystem: Integration with Complexity Theory and Social Network Analysis

Abstract: The concept of the policy subsystem is an essential building block for several of the basic frameworks of policy process studies. Over time issues have become more complex, crossing subsystem boundaries, and so subsystems have escalated in their complexity as well. It is increasingly insufficient to study just one policy subsystem and so scholars have turned to studying boundary‐spanning regimes or policy networks. In this essay, we review the major contributions to developing the concept of a policy subsystem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pioneer studies of Lowi and Schattschneider on policy subsystems stressed two different but complementary dynamics (McGee & Jones, 2019). The former warned about the potential capture that special interests could exert within policy subsystems due to their relative closeness to those in charge of regulation.…”
Section: Studying Processes Of Policy Change In the Mining Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneer studies of Lowi and Schattschneider on policy subsystems stressed two different but complementary dynamics (McGee & Jones, 2019). The former warned about the potential capture that special interests could exert within policy subsystems due to their relative closeness to those in charge of regulation.…”
Section: Studying Processes Of Policy Change In the Mining Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the idea of a systems‐based approach in the social sciences has been argued to be based on hope, with its advantages exaggerated (Cairney and Geyer, 2017). OH principles could be accused of naivety and avoiding the reality of the fact that each of the candidate disciplines that would be needed for joining up (such as environmental science, public health science, veterinary science, urban planning, for instance) each operate within their own dimensions of complexity – and can be part of different policy subsystems (McGee and Jones, 2019).…”
Section: One Health As a Global Policy Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, public problems are increasingly complex in ways that defy the types of partitioning mentioned earlier. In an article appearing in this issue, McGee and Jones () note that it is no longer sufficient to understand much of the job that public managers do to be confined to particular organizations or issue areas. In a world where understanding multiple subsystems address a given public problem, and doing your job may mean competing with other public organizations, politics becomes central to the day‐to‐day job in different ways than has been the case before.…”
Section: Governance Boundary Spanning Problems and Public Affairsmentioning
confidence: 99%