2011
DOI: 10.1080/15348458.2011.598127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing the Native/Nonnative Speaker Dichotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, their language socialization in the United States was marked with 3 identity investments: (1) an experienced EFL teacher, (2) an L2 user, and (3) a burgeoning scholar. The stories of Baris and Serkan concurred with the sociocultural, post-modernist views of identity in the sense that their identities were dynamic, dialogic, situated, and multiple (Duff & Uchida, 1997;Faez, 2011;Lantolf & Pavlenko, 2001;Norton, 2000). Similar to many language teachers who sought to reconcile their various identities (Armour, 2004;Ha, 2008), Baris and Serkan's Downloaded by [Cambridge University Library] at 20:44 15 August 2015 main identity investment as burgeoning scholars blended in with their identities as L2 users and teachers, as a result of their language socialization experiences in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, their language socialization in the United States was marked with 3 identity investments: (1) an experienced EFL teacher, (2) an L2 user, and (3) a burgeoning scholar. The stories of Baris and Serkan concurred with the sociocultural, post-modernist views of identity in the sense that their identities were dynamic, dialogic, situated, and multiple (Duff & Uchida, 1997;Faez, 2011;Lantolf & Pavlenko, 2001;Norton, 2000). Similar to many language teachers who sought to reconcile their various identities (Armour, 2004;Ha, 2008), Baris and Serkan's Downloaded by [Cambridge University Library] at 20:44 15 August 2015 main identity investment as burgeoning scholars blended in with their identities as L2 users and teachers, as a result of their language socialization experiences in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…After the dominance of the prestigious status of the so-called native speaker, second language (L2) acquisition researchers have started to recognize teachers from a variety of backgrounds (Canagarajah, 2005;Davies, 2003;Holliday & Aboshiha, 2009;Moussu, 2010;Moussu & Llurda, 2008;Faez, 2011;Park, 2012). The discussion during the past 20 years on native speaker fallacy (Phillipson, 1992) revolves around the idea that the term native speaker is discriminative since the expanding nature of English has resulted in the rejection of home country status (Holliday & Aboshiha, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review Teacher Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, EIL students and their teachers need to know that "appropriate" grammatical and lexical structures are neither set in stone nor are they the sole property of "L1-speakers," which is itself a contested construct that oversimplifies plurilinguals' competences in multiple languages and language varieties (Faez, 2011). The impact of these realizations is currently felt more in teaching EIL (TEIL) in elementary and adult education than in secondary and higher education, but that gap may yet be filled as views of linguistic conventions and beliefs about discourse and language "ownership" become increasingly critical.…”
Section: Critical Language Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native speakerism has been increasingly questioned. Rampton (1990), Medgyes, (1992, Moussu and Llurda, (2008), Faez (2011), and Viáfara (2016, among many others, have problematized the lack of correlation between teaching skills and nativeness, the unreality of setting native speaker proficiency as a goal for foreign language speakers, the unfair classification that nativeness and nonnativeness create, and the inadequacy future language teachers in peripheral countries may feel due to native speakerism.…”
Section: Critical Aspects In Elt and Colombian Eltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native speakerism has been increasingly questioned. Rampton (1990), Medgyes, (1992, Moussu and Llurda, (2008), Faez (2011), and Viáfara (2016, among many others, have problematized the lack of correlation between teaching skills and nativeness, the unreality of setting native speaker proficiency as a goal for foreign language speakers, the unfair classification that nativeness and nonnativeness create, and the inadequacy future language teachers in peripheral countries may feel due to native speakerism.The dimensions of coloniality interplay with one another; therefore, the coloniality of being is linked with the coloniality of knowledge. In this sense, for example, González (2010González ( , 2012 discusses academic colonialism present in Colombian ELT, when teachers' and teacher educators' local knowledge is displaced by foreign agencies and editorial companies whose native speakers design, train, and certify non-native teachers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%