The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01078-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing the interventions of open innovation systems between the nexus of quadruple organization cultural dynamics and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sofiyabadi et al ( 2020 ) designed strategies for measuring innovation practice, development, and exploration to investigate the impact of open technological innovation used before and now on enterprise knowledge management strategies and innovation output types; results found that IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) management and internal innovation network management of enterprises were essential for open technological innovation of enterprises. Qureshi et al ( 2021 ) used a structural equation model to analyze the correlation between intellectual property, open technological innovation, and organizational performance; analysis results found that intellectual property and open technological innovation had a significant positive correlation; the impact of intellectual property had a positive impact on organizational performance through open technological innovation. Hameed et al ( 2021 ) used quantitative research and cross-sectional research methods to solve the problem of declining open technological innovation capabilities that hindered the overall performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises; consequently, intellectual property, network strategy, and research and development design were the decisive factors of enterprises’ open technological innovation performance.…”
Section: Development Status Of Open Technology Innovation In Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sofiyabadi et al ( 2020 ) designed strategies for measuring innovation practice, development, and exploration to investigate the impact of open technological innovation used before and now on enterprise knowledge management strategies and innovation output types; results found that IPR (Intellectual Property Rights) management and internal innovation network management of enterprises were essential for open technological innovation of enterprises. Qureshi et al ( 2021 ) used a structural equation model to analyze the correlation between intellectual property, open technological innovation, and organizational performance; analysis results found that intellectual property and open technological innovation had a significant positive correlation; the impact of intellectual property had a positive impact on organizational performance through open technological innovation. Hameed et al ( 2021 ) used quantitative research and cross-sectional research methods to solve the problem of declining open technological innovation capabilities that hindered the overall performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises; consequently, intellectual property, network strategy, and research and development design were the decisive factors of enterprises’ open technological innovation performance.…”
Section: Development Status Of Open Technology Innovation In Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After checking the reliability, the specified data were further analyzed to ensure convergent validity. Convergent validity explains, how accurate the indicators of a construct converge on their corresponding construct (Qureshi et al , 2021). Researchers have emphasized that the value of average variance extracted (AVE) should be above 0.50 in the case of reflective constructs.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logical explanation is firms’ failure to fully prepare and acquire knowledge and resources, a mismatch between environmental actions and organizational strategy (Ervin et al 2013 ). Studies have categorized several dynamic capabilities, namely the existence of relative environmental strategies and responsibilities to actively mobilize resources (Ali et al 2021a ; Arda et al 2019 ; Yang et al 2015 ; Lee et al 2016 ), moving toward flexibility and reorganization (Russo and Harrison 2005 ; Girod and Whittington 2017 ; Abeelen et al 2013 ), experienced R&D (Mithani 2017; Lee and Min 2015 ), technical and innovative knowledge and skill (Ali et al 2021b ; Cainelli et al 2015 ; Bhupendra and Sangle 2015 ; Arvanitis and Ley 2013 ), and reshaping human capital management to achieve economic, social, and environmental sustainability goals (Aravind 2012 ; Qureshi et al 2021 ; Singh et al 2020 ; Yunus, 2021 ).…”
Section: Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%