Reconceptualizing Teacher Quality to Inform Preservice and Inservice Professional Development

Abstract

by Cochran-Smith et al., presents the findings from portions of the remaining two programs of research: research on teacher preparation for the knowledge society and research on teacher preparation for diversity and equity.Studies outlined in the second research program examined the influence of school-based fieldwork opportunities in teacher preparation on student teacher learning and explored the traditional student teaching combination of university supervisor, mentor teacher, and student teacher, as well as alternatives to this triad. A number of studies also investigated how teacher candidate characteristics and factors related to school and fieldwork features shape teacher learning and experiences during the practicum/student teaching. Findings revealed the very different, often conflicting views of teaching and learning that universities espouse in contrast to teaching and learning implemented in schools and/or mandated by education policies.Studies in the third program of research referenced the changing demographics in public schools and examined the opportunities for learning to teach diverse student populations provided to preservice teachers in individual courses and fieldwork. In particular, research examined the influence of teacher preparation on altering teacher beliefs about diverse students and developing effective practices for teaching them. However, the studies about teacher preparation practice stopped short of informing effective practice for student learning because they "simply ignored school students' learning, assuming that the goal of teacher preparation is teacher learning" (p. 117).The two review articles by Cochran-Smith and colleagues provide a number of implications and directions for research and practice in teacher education. In particular, the findings of the review coupled with findings from other articles in this and previous issues of JTE suggest a reconceptualization of teacher quality that has the potential to influence our characterization of quality inservice and preservice teacher professional development. The following sections provide a brief overview of (a) the characterization of teacher quality from a policy research perspective that has dominated the past two decades and influenced the schism between university and school views of effective teaching and learning noted by Cochran-Smith et al. and (b) a set of considerations derived from articles in this and previous JTE issues that can be incorporated into new views of teacher quality to inform new views of teacher preservice and inservice professional development. From Teacher Quality to Teaching QualityThree areas have traditionally been considered in relation to teacher quality or effectiveness (Kennedy, 2008): cognitive resources that include knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and dispositions; performance in the classroom; and effect on students. Although these three categories provide a framework for viewing and assessing different facets of quality, their operationalization has often been problematic. Federal i...

On the Shoulders of Giants: Benefits of Participating in a Dialogic Professional Development Program for In-Service Teachers

“…Over the last two decades, international research on professional development has led to an understanding of the factors that contribute to high-quality and effective teacher professional development, which improves teaching and student achievement (Penuel et al, 2007;Pianta et al, 2008;Desimone, 2009;Downer et al, 2009;Higgins and Parsons, 2009;Hill et al, 2013;Knight et al, 2014Knight et al, , 2015Cordingley et al, 2015;Brown and Weber, 2016;De Naeghel et al, 2016;Jukes et al, 2017;Kutaka et al, 2017). This previous research has identified the positive impact that teacher training programs have on in-service teachers' activities.…”

“…In recent years, TPD research has focused on creating knowledge that contributes to teacher quality and effective teaching in a context in which students are increasingly diverse, guaranteeing both equitable learning opportunities and outcomes (Knight et al, 2015;Impedovo, 2016;Chatelier and Rudolph, 2018). The latest contributions are directed toward reconceptualizing high-quality teacher professional development, starting from a socially inclusive pedagogic work based on what is already known about the new conceptions of teaching and learning that are contributing to not leaving any students behind (Knight et al, 2015;Gale et al, 2017;Lampert et al, 2019).…”

Are instructivist pedagogies more appropriate for learning the sciences in South African low-quintile schools than western literature suggests?

“…Some of these teachers are able to inspire considerable numbers of their learners out of the pervasive apathy characteristic of their environment and guide them to reasonable achievement. However, when I evaluate their teaching in terms of western literature, such as Knight et al (2015), I cannot acknowledge their skill, since they teach in a completely instructivist manner with strong behaviourist elements. Similarly, I find that the kinds of resources which these teachers use to apparent effect may be considered harmful when evaluated in terms of western literature, such as that by Burns and Ungerleider (2003).…”

People with Disabilities and the Formation of the Basic Education Teacher: A Study of Brazilian Reality

“…In addition, when dealing with teacher's excellence there is a need to address both teacher quality, which focus on teachers' characteristics and cognitive resources (knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and dispositions), and teaching quality, which emphasis classroom practice and student's learning (Kennedy, 2008;Knight et al, 2015). Nevertheless, excellence can also manifest in varied and different ways (Lowma, 1995;Young, 2009).…”