Reconceptualising ‘risk’: Towards a humanistic paradigm of sexual offending

Abstract

Within Western criminal justice traditions, the ‘risk’ paradigm has become the defining logic of contemporary laws and policies on sex offender management. This article critically examines the limitations of current technocratic and algorithmic approaches to risk in relation to sexual offending and how they might be addressed. Drawing on nearly two decades of theoretical and empirical research conducted by the author, it applies the learning on sex offender reintegration and desistance to advance a ‘humanistic’ paradigm of sexual offending. The paper attempts to counter some of the dangers of algorithmic justice and shift risk-based discourse away from its predominantly ‘scientific’ origins. It argues that such a move towards a more expansive and progressive version of risk within criminal justice discourses would better capture the realities of sexual offending behaviour and its real-world governance.

Book Review: Sex, Consent and Justice: A New Feminist Framework

“…It acts on both criminals and victims and brings society into the repair process. In restorative approach, individuals with a history of sexual offending stand a chance to be released from the 'sex offender' label (McAlinden, 2022). Sikka thoroughly examines the models of restorative justice, restorative justice in practice, its effectiveness in obtaining social justice, and the flaws of this alternative.…”