2012
DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v2n3p203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualising manual handling: Foundations for practice change

Abstract:

Background: Healthcare involves complex manual handling tasks that are unique to the industry. Despite research intended to improve carer safety, substantial rates of manual handling injuries persist within the nursing profession. This paper reviews manual handling issues arising from patient care activities and the strategies deployed in healthcare facilities to reduce musculoskeletal injuries.

Discussion: Conven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no consistent evidence to support the widespread and popular application of isolated manual handling training and "no-lift" policies (manual handling training and minimise transfer and lifting strain by using lifting devices) (Dawson et al, 2007, Jensen et al, 2006, Martimo et al, 2008, Warming et al, 2008. This is supported by recent literature in nursing (Hartvigsen et al, 2005, Kay et al, 2012, Martimo et al, 2008 and other working populations (Clemes et al, 2010, Hogan et al, 2014, Verbeek et al, 2012.…”
Section: Mixedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consistent evidence to support the widespread and popular application of isolated manual handling training and "no-lift" policies (manual handling training and minimise transfer and lifting strain by using lifting devices) (Dawson et al, 2007, Jensen et al, 2006, Martimo et al, 2008, Warming et al, 2008. This is supported by recent literature in nursing (Hartvigsen et al, 2005, Kay et al, 2012, Martimo et al, 2008 and other working populations (Clemes et al, 2010, Hogan et al, 2014, Verbeek et al, 2012.…”
Section: Mixedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TROPHI has incorporated a range of cultural differences in its development, but it is recognised that there may be organisational, national and individual differences (Kay, Glass, and Evans 2012;Myers et al 2012), barriers to implementation (Koppelaar et al 2013) and differing levels of compliance (Berthellete et al 2012). These differences may be represented in the complex score system of the tool but further comparison studies are required, e.g.…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%