2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14092201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recomputation and Updating of MOLA Geolocation

Abstract: The Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) Precision Experiment Data Records (PEDR) serve as the geodetic reference of Mars. However, these MOLA footprints were geolocated using outdated auxiliary information that dates back to 2003. In this study, we recompute the MOLA PEDR footprint locations and investigate the impact of the updated spacecraft orbit model and Mars rotational model on MOLA’s geolocation. We observe quasi-exponential increases near the poles of up to 30 m in the recomputation residuals for the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PEDR data set was geolocated using a MGS trajectory and a Mars rotational model dating back to 2003. Therefore, we have incorporated an updated orbit model from Konopliv et al (2006) and IAU2015 Mars rotational model as in Archinal et al (2018) to update the MOLA geolocation (Xiao, Stark, Chen, & Oberst, 2022, Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al, 2022. The motion of the spacecraft during laser time-of-flight has been considered.…”
Section: Reprocessed Mola Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PEDR data set was geolocated using a MGS trajectory and a Mars rotational model dating back to 2003. Therefore, we have incorporated an updated orbit model from Konopliv et al (2006) and IAU2015 Mars rotational model as in Archinal et al (2018) to update the MOLA geolocation (Xiao, Stark, Chen, & Oberst, 2022, Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al, 2022. The motion of the spacecraft during laser time-of-flight has been considered.…”
Section: Reprocessed Mola Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2006) and IAU2015 Mars rotational model as in Archinal et al. (2018) to update the MOLA geolocation (Xiao, Stark, Chen, & Oberst, 2022, Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al., 2022). The motion of the spacecraft during laser time‐of‐flight has been considered.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2006) and IAU2015 Mars rotational model as in Archinal et al. (2018) to update the MOLA geolocation (Xiao, Stark, Chen, & Oberst, 2022; Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al., 2022). Meanwhile, a pointing aberration correction, which the PEDR processing ignored, has been added during the reprocessing to account for the special relativity effects (Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Reprocessed Mola Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, there still remain significant profile shifts, including a global systematic temporal bias in height (see also Section 3; Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al., 2022), due to timing, pointing and other unidentified errors. These error sources need to be taken care of in order to accurately and precisely obtain the seasonal level variations at the polar regions (Xiao, Stark, Chen, & Oberst, 2022; Xiao, Stark, Steinbrügge, et al., 2022).…”
Section: Reprocessed Mola Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process takes into account the motion of the spacecraft during the laser pulse ToFs and the pointing aberration due to the relative velocity of the spacecraft with respect to the observer. Precise geolocation requires accurate modeling of these effects [229,230]. When a laser altimeter operates close to the Sun, for example, MLA and BELA at Mercury, general relativistic effects such as the Shapiro delay should also be incorporated to correct the ranging distance.…”
Section: Lidar Altimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%