2016
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommending Groups to Users Using User-Group Engagement and Time-Dependent Matrix Factorization

Abstract: Social networks often provide group features to help users with similar interests associate and consume content together. Recommending groups to users poses challenges due to their complex relationship: user-group affinity is typically measured implicitly and varies with time; similarly, group characteristics change as users join and leave. To tackle these challenges, we adapt existing matrix factorization techniques to learn user-group affinity based on two different implicit engagement metrics: (i) which gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, semantic information from descriptions of groups [3] and visual information from photos shared by users [28] can be incorporated with a collaborative filtering framework to perform personalized group recommendations. User behaviors in different time periods [30,34], such as joining groups, can also be leveraged for recommending groups to users. However, the requirement of side information degrades the performance of those methods when recommending groups to users with only interaction information.…”
Section: Group Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, semantic information from descriptions of groups [3] and visual information from photos shared by users [28] can be incorporated with a collaborative filtering framework to perform personalized group recommendations. User behaviors in different time periods [30,34], such as joining groups, can also be leveraged for recommending groups to users. However, the requirement of side information degrades the performance of those methods when recommending groups to users with only interaction information.…”
Section: Group Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multiple studies for core number computation under different settings including a linear-time in-memory algorithm (Batagelj and Zaversnik 2003), I/O efficient algorithms (Wen et al 2016;Cheng et al 2011), locally computing and estimating (Cui et al 2014) and core number maintenance on dynamic graphs (Aksu et al 2014;Zhang et al 2016). The engagement dynamic in social networks has attracted significant focus, e.g., (Wang et al 2016;Chwe 2000;Bhawalkar et al 2015;Malliaros and Vazirgiannis 2013;Wu et al 2013;Chitnis, Fomin, and Golovach 2013;. The k-core becomes more and more popular in social studies, because its degeneration property can be used to quantify engagement dynamics in real social networks (Malliaros and Vazirgiannis 2013).…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The user engagement on social network has attracted significant interests over recent years (Wang et al 2016;Wu et al 2013;Bhawalkar et al 2015). k-core is a simple and popular model based on degree constraint, which has been widely used to measure the network engagement (Malliaros and Vazirgiannis 2013;Chitnis, Fomin, and Golovach 2013;Abello and Queyroi 2013;Garcia, Mavrodiev, and Schweitzer 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%