2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13278-014-0234-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommender systems based on collaborative filtering and resource allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 3 shows the MAE of CUPCF in comparison with a number of state-of-the-art recommendation methods mentioned in references of [18,[28][29]. The percentage of improving of CUPCF than other models and techniques such as CF is 2.5%, CF-RA is 0.28%, CF-Diff is 0.8%, CF-Rank is 1.2%, CF-MW is 1.1%, CF-HW is 1.9%, Pearson is 1.5%, RA-COS is 1.4%, RA-SRC is 5.7%, SRC is 11.4%, RA-CPC is 1.1%, CPC is 2.3%, Three-Segment is 2.5%, BCF is 6.3%, NHSM is 12%, PIP is 15%, COS is 15.5%, K-Means Leader is 1.2% and K-Means is 3.2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 3 shows the MAE of CUPCF in comparison with a number of state-of-the-art recommendation methods mentioned in references of [18,[28][29]. The percentage of improving of CUPCF than other models and techniques such as CF is 2.5%, CF-RA is 0.28%, CF-Diff is 0.8%, CF-Rank is 1.2%, CF-MW is 1.1%, CF-HW is 1.9%, Pearson is 1.5%, RA-COS is 1.4%, RA-SRC is 5.7%, SRC is 11.4%, RA-CPC is 1.1%, CPC is 2.3%, Three-Segment is 2.5%, BCF is 6.3%, NHSM is 12%, PIP is 15%, COS is 15.5%, K-Means Leader is 1.2% and K-Means is 3.2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Javari et al proposed a recommender system based on collaborative filtering and resources allocation for improving the performance of their system. Using the resource allocation method, they were able to obtain the degree of confidence of each user based on the similarity achieved [18]. In 2017, Khalaji designed a hybrid recommender system based on neural network and resource allocation that solved the scalability and cold start problems [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, service prediction works proactively propose services based on user's historical context information. Similar to traditional recommender systems, such as Javari et al (2014), that consider the correlation among user and items, service prediction works, such as Adomavicius and Tuzhilin (2011), Xiao et al (2010) and Baltrunas and Ricci (2013), consider the correlation between context information and an item (e.g. a service) using different filtering techniques (Baltrunas and Ricci 2013), which can be correlated with ontology-based matching (Xiao et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neighbor users) are used to produce suitable recommendations to a given user (i.e. an active user) in the recommendation process [1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The CF approach uses rates of the active user to previously purchased items to make recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%