2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended practices for the use of spinning rotor gauges in inter-laboratory comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears in both the q 01 ( T ) and q 0 ( T ) components of Eq. (3) and consists of the combined uncertainty of the effective accommodation coefficient (inverse calibration factor) determined for N 2 (<0.5%), 21 the relative change in the effective accommodation coefficient for H 2 (6%), 24 the long-term stability of the calibrated effective accommodation coefficient (2%) 25 the estimated change due to heating the SRG to 150°C (2%), 26 and the statistical uncertainty due the linear fit to the pressure rise data (2%). The uncertainty of the background outgassing rate q 0 ( T ) is approximately u q 0 = 7%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears in both the q 01 ( T ) and q 0 ( T ) components of Eq. (3) and consists of the combined uncertainty of the effective accommodation coefficient (inverse calibration factor) determined for N 2 (<0.5%), 21 the relative change in the effective accommodation coefficient for H 2 (6%), 24 the long-term stability of the calibrated effective accommodation coefficient (2%) 25 the estimated change due to heating the SRG to 150°C (2%), 26 and the statistical uncertainty due the linear fit to the pressure rise data (2%). The uncertainty of the background outgassing rate q 0 ( T ) is approximately u q 0 = 7%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rotors that are initially smooth and free of scratches may perform differently than those that are rough. Experience in other labs [23] suggests that crash tests may, in some cases, have a larger effect than reported in Chang and Abbott [22]. In any case, crashing the rotor should be avoided as it may change the accommodation coefficient.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Between 0.2 Pa and 2 Pa the effective accommodation coefficient is not constant but may be described by a simple linear model. 10,11 We did not use the SRG above 2 Pa in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%