1993
DOI: 10.1016/0264-8172(93)90075-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended practice for probe permeametry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TinyPerm-derived permeabilities obtained from the the highly permeable Navajo Sandstone were found to be 1.8 times higher than plug-derived permeability values (Fossen et al, 2011;Torabi and Fossen, 2009). Sutherland et al (1993) discuss not only the advantages but also limitations of probe permeametry, emphasizing the need of standardized experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…TinyPerm-derived permeabilities obtained from the the highly permeable Navajo Sandstone were found to be 1.8 times higher than plug-derived permeability values (Fossen et al, 2011;Torabi and Fossen, 2009). Sutherland et al (1993) discuss not only the advantages but also limitations of probe permeametry, emphasizing the need of standardized experimental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Compared to permeability of water, gas permeability is easier to measure, requires less time and produces more reproducible result [7]. The flow of a fluid (laminar flow) in a porous solid is described by Darcy's law [4] and for a probe permeametry the permeability is calculated from a modified Darcy's equation [1].…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Equipment Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-situ measurements of the gas permeability of natural sandstone using steady state portable permeameters is now well developed for analogue studies of sandstone petroleum reservoirs at outcrop [1] and in the laboratory 12]. Equipment is readily available 'off-the-shelf' and proven in use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical factor, when calculated numerically for a given sample and probe geometry, accounts for the complex multidimensional flow pattern throughout the porous medium, capturing the edge effects associated with the geometry of the sample and probe, and thus boundary conditions that are simply not accounted for by an empirical calibration using core plugs. This can be particularly true when using a calibration relationship [Robertson and McPhee, 1990;Sutherland et al, 1993] to solve for permeability on a sample with a strongly differing geometry or size than that of the core plugs used in the calibration exercise.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis: Semianalytical Inverse Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%