Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes

Rossman, Amy Y.; Crous, Pedro W.; Hyde, Kevin D.; Hawksworth, David L.; Aptroot, André; Bezerra, José Luiz; Bhat, Jayarama D.; Boehm, E. W. A.; Braun, Uwe; Boonmee, Saranyaphat; Camporesi, Erio; Chomnunti, Putarak; Dai, Dong-Qin; D’souza, Melvina J.; Dissanayake, Asha J.; Jones, E. B. Gareth; Groenewald, Johannes Z.; Hernández-Restrepo, Margarita; Hongsanan, Sinang; Jaklitsch, Walter M.; Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.; Jing, Li Wen; Kirk, Paul M.; Lawrey, James D.; Mapook, Ausana; McKenzie, Eric H. C.; Monkai, Jutamart; Phillips, Alan J. L.; Phookamsak, Rungtiwa; Raja, Huzefa A.; Seifert, Keith A.; Senanayake, Indunil C.; Slippers, Bernard; Suetrong, Satinee; Tanaka, Kazuaki; Taylor, Joanne E.; Thambugala, Kasun M.; Tian, Qing; Tibpromma, Saowaluck; Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N.; Wijayawardene, Nalin N.; Wikee, Saowanee; Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Wu, Haixia; Yan, Jiye; Yang, Tao; Zhang, Ying

doi:10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.02.14

Cited by 107 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 89 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although a list has been published of recommendations for competing genera in the Dothideomycetes (Rossman et al 2015b) based on Wijayawardene et al (2014), a number of additional competing generic names have been noted since then and are listed here with recommendations for the generic name to use.…”

Section: Dothideomycetesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These papers address genera in the major groups of Sordariomycetes such as Diaporthales (Rossman et al 2015a), Hypocreales (Rossman et al . 2013, Quandt et al 2014), Magnaporthales (Zhang et al 2016), Microascales and Ophiostomatales (de Beer et al 2013), Xylariaceae (Stadler et al 2013) and remaining Sordariomycetes (Réblová et al 2016) as well as Dothideomycetes (Rossman et al . 2015b), Eurotiales (Samson et al 2014, Visagie et al .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names of Ascomycota with recommendations for their use or protection

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the change to one scientific name for fungal species, numerous papers have been published with recommendations for use or protection of competing generic names in major groups of ascomycetes. Although genera in each group of fungi were carefully considered, some competing generic names were overlooked. This paper makes recommendations for additional competing genera not considered in previous papers. Chairs of relevant Working Groups of the ICTF were consulted in the development of these recommendations. A number of generic names need protection, specifically Amarenographium over Amarenomyces, Amniculicola over Anguillospora, Balansia over Ephelis, Claviceps over Sphacelia, Drepanopeziza over Gloeosporidiella and Gloeosporium, Golovinomyces over Euoidium, Holwaya over Crinium, Hypocrella over Aschersonia, Labridella over Griphosphaerioma, Metacapnodium over Antennularia, and Neonectria over Cylindrocarpon and Heliscus. The following new combinations are made: Amniculicola longissima, Atichia maunauluana, Diaporthe columnaris, D. liquidambaris, D. longiparaphysata, D. palmicola, D. tersa, Elsinoë bucidae, E.caricae, E. choisyae, E. paeoniae, E. psidii, E. zorniae, Eupelte shoemakeri, Godronia myrtilli, G. raduloides, Sarcinella mirabilis, S. pulchra, Schizothyrium jamaicense, and Trichothallus niger. Finally, one new species name, Diaporthe azadirachte, is introduced to validate an earlier name, and the conservation of Discula with a new type, D. destructiva, is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Dothideomycetesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names of Ascomycota with recommendations for their use or protection

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although, Batzer et al (2008) later considered Z. jamaicensis as distinct from S. pomi, these genera have been shown to be congeneric in phylogenetic studies (Ma et al 2010, Gao et al 2014. Therefore, Rossman et al (2015) choose the name Schizothyrium over Zygophiala as it was the older name. Additionally, Rossman et al (2015) combined nine species in Schizothyrium which were previously named Zygophiala.…”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, Rossman et al (2015) choose the name Schizothyrium over Zygophiala as it was the older name. Additionally, Rossman et al (2015) combined nine species in Schizothyrium which were previously named Zygophiala. Schizothyrium pomi is similar to S. acerinum in some aspects, but in other is unrelated and this will be the subject of a later paper.…”

Section: Taxonomymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Schizothyriaceae

Phookamsak¹

2016

Mycosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Schizothyriaceae is a poorly understood family which was introduced to accommodate epiphytes belonging to the class Dothideomycetes. Sixteen sexual and asexual genera have at various times been accommodated in Schizothyriaceae. However, modern taxonomic descriptions, molecular data and phylogenetic investigation of the genera in this family are limited. We therefore revisit the genera in Schizothyriaceae by loaning and examining the type and other specimens from herbaria worldwide. Circumscriptions of the genera previously placed in Schizothyriaceae are provided with illustrations and their higher level placements are determined based on modern descriptions. Based on morphology, we currently accept Hexagonella, Lecideopsella, Mycerema, Plochmopeltis and Schizothyrium in Schizothyriaceae. Kerniomyces, Metathyriella and Myriangiella are treated in Schizothyriaceae, genera incertae sedis, while Chaetoplaca is transferred to Ascomycetes, genera incertae sedis. Neopeltella is excluded from Schizothyriaceae, based on its thyriothecial ascomata and tentatively placed in Micropeltidaceae. Henningsiella is placed in Saccardiaceae due to its discoid ascomata. Linopeltis and Orthobellus are tentatively treated in Dothideomycetes, genera incertae sedis. Hysteropeltella which has elongate apothecial or hypothecia-like ascomata, is placed in Patellariaceae due to its similar morphology with Baggea. Mendogia is transferred to the family Myriangiaceae based on a morphologically similar specimen which is phylogenetically placed in Myriangiaceae. The hyphomycetous, Zygophiala is reported as the asexual morph of Schizothyrium. Hence, the genus is currently treated as a synonym of Schizothyrium. Nevertheless, representative species of the genera in Schizothyriaceae, including the type species, need to be recollected and sequenced to clarify the natural placement in Schizothyriaceae.Keywords -asexual morph -epifoliar fungi -epiphytic fungi -Schizothyrium-taxonomy IntroductionSchizothyriaceae is a poorly understood family in the class Dothideomycetes, which comprises 16 genera and approximately 94 species (von Arx & Müller 1975, Eriksson 1981, Batzer et al. 2008, Crous et al. 2009, Index Fungorum 2016. The family contains various sexual genera with ambiguous morphological characters, comprising two types of ascomata, viz. membranous and thyriothecial (Hyde at al. 2013). The genera in Schizothyriaceae have been reported as epiphytic, pathogenic or saprobic on various plants (von Arx & Müller 1975, Batzer et al. 2008, Crous et al. 2009, Farr & Rossman 2015. Some genera cause disease on economic crops, such as Zygophiala, the putative asexual morph of Schizothyrium. These taxa cause the sooty blotch and flyspeck (SBFS) of apple and pear fruits (Batzer et al. 2005, Gao et al. 2014.Schizothyriaceae was introduced by Saccardo (1928) as -Schizothyrieae‖ based on von Höhnel (1917) to accommodate epiphytic fungi and was originally described as -exciple depressed on cuticle, superficial, membranous, irregular fringed when mature‖ (Sa...

show abstract

Primary Keys and Miscellaneous Fungi

Pitt¹,

Hocking

2022

Fungi and Food Spoilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recommended names for pleomorphic genera in Dothideomycetes

Cited by 107 publications

References 89 publications

Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names of Ascomycota with recommendations for their use or protection

Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names of Ascomycota with recommendations for their use or protection

Schizothyriaceae

Primary Keys and Miscellaneous Fungi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About