Recommended Mitigation Measures for an Influenza Pandemic in Remote and Isolated First Nations Communities of Ontario, Canada: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach

Abstract

Influenza pandemics disproportionately impact remote and/or isolated Indigenous communities worldwide. The differential risk experienced by such communities warrants the recommendation of specific mitigation measures. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were conducted with adult key health care informants from three remote and isolated Canadian First Nations communities of sub-Arctic Ontario. Forty-eight mitigation measures (including the setting, pandemic period, trigger, and duration) were questioned. Participants' responses were summarized and collected data were deductively and inductively coded. The participants recommended 41 of the questioned mitigation measures, and often differed from previous literature and national recommendations. Results revealed that barriers, such as overcrowded housing, limited supplies, and health care infrastructure, impacted the feasibility of implementing mitigation measures. These findings suggest that pandemic plans should recommend control strategies for remote and isolated Canadian First Nations communities that may not be supported in other communities. These findings highlight the importance of engaging locally impacted populations using participatory approaches in policy decisionmaking processes. Other countries with remote and/or isolated Indigenous communities are encouraged to include recommendations for mitigation measures that specifically address the unique needs of such communities in an effort to improve their health outcomes during the next influenza pandemic.

Bird harvesting practices and knowledge, risk perceptions, and attitudes regarding avian influenza among Canadian First Nations subsistence hunters: implications for influenza pandemic plans

“…As such, the research topic was locally relevant as it stemmed from previous research conducted in the region that explored culturally-appropriate measures to mitigate the effects of an influenza pandemic in the setting of a remote and isolated Canadian First Nations community [28]. Residents of the study community expressed questions and concerns about the transmission potential of AIVs from influenza-infected wild birds to subsistence hunters.…”

Social consequences of mass quarantine during epidemics: a systematic review with implications for the COVID-19 response

“…Eleven articles from various geographical and disease contexts highlighted the psychological implications of mass quarantine as emotional distress and symptoms of mental illness. [22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32]35 Among people in or after quarantine, some experienced emotional distress, including:…”

“…annoyance, 32 anxiety, 25,29 boredom, 23,25,32 disappointment and life dissatisfaction, 24,32,35 fear of infection, 23,25,30,34 isolation, 23,25,32 . 27 Nevertheless, this result was prone to reporting bias as the survey response rate was less than one per cent; 27 confirmation of psychiatric disorders required further clinical diagnosis, on which data were not available.…”

Preparedness of community-based organisations in biohazard: reliability and validity of an assessment tool

“…Iran’s PHC network has taken some advocacy and training programmes focusing on community partnership 13 14. CBOs can equip public health officials with information about vulnerable groups and how to meet their particular needs 16. However, Iran still lacks an assessment tool evaluating the preparedness of CBOs in biohazards.…”