2022
DOI: 10.1002/pds.5578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations on the calculation of confidence intervals for sequence symmetry analyses

Abstract: With this letter, we would like to provide guidance on the calculation of confidence intervals when conducting a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA).The SSA is an increasingly used method for detecting drug safety signals [1][2][3] and quantifying prescription cascades. 4,5 The method is conceptually simple: Consider an exposure drug X, which causes the initiation of an outcome drug Y. If there is a causal relation between

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,23,33 Next, we calculated an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dividing the cSR by the null-effect ratio. 34 To estimate the incidence rate of the gabapentin-LD prescribing cascade among all older adults initiating a gabapentinoid with PSSA, we calculated the difference in the number of patients between those initiating a LD after gabapentinoid initiation and those initiating a LD before gabapentinoid initiation and divided the result by the number of patients initiating a gabapentinoid between 2013 and 2019. We adjusted the estimated incidence rate by the length of the exposure window and presented it in terms of person-years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21,23,33 Next, we calculated an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dividing the cSR by the null-effect ratio. 34 To estimate the incidence rate of the gabapentin-LD prescribing cascade among all older adults initiating a gabapentinoid with PSSA, we calculated the difference in the number of patients between those initiating a LD after gabapentinoid initiation and those initiating a LD before gabapentinoid initiation and divided the result by the number of patients initiating a gabapentinoid between 2013 and 2019. We adjusted the estimated incidence rate by the length of the exposure window and presented it in terms of person-years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null‐effect sequence ratio has been previously described and represents an expected sequence ratio based on the probability of the sequencing of initiation of marker drugs after index drugs in the absence of a causal association 21,23,33 . Next, we calculated an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by dividing the cSR by the null‐effect ratio 34 . To estimate the incidence rate of the gabapentin–LD prescribing cascade among all older adults initiating a gabapentinoid with PSSA, we calculated the difference in the number of patients between those initiating a LD after gabapentinoid initiation and those initiating a LD before gabapentinoid initiation and divided the result by the number of patients initiating a gabapentinoid between 2013 and 2019.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 95% confidence intervals based on Jeffrey's interval for binomial proportions. 9 As the exposure-anchored SSA is susceptible to temporal prescribing trends for the outcome drug, we adjusted for such trends using null-effect SR adjustment. 10 As a sensitivity analysis, and to evaluate the robustness of our results, we repeated the analysis with shortened time windows of 90 and 180 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SR estimates an incidence rate ratio, and ratios below one can be interpreted as protective effects. We obtained 95% confidence intervals based on Jeffrey's interval for binomial proportions 9 . As the exposure‐anchored SSA is susceptible to temporal prescribing trends for the outcome drug, we adjusted for such trends using null‐effect SR adjustment 10 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%