Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants

Schnitman, Paul A.; Shulman, Leonard B.

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0052

Cited by 148 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(6) There is an 85% success rate at the end of a fiveyear post-restorative period, with an 80% success rate at the end of 10 years post-restorative or function. These criteria, as proposed by Smith and Zarb (1989), are much more demanding than those set forth in the First NIH-Harvard Consensus Development Conference: Dental Implants: Benefit & Risk in 1978 (Schnitman and Schulman, 1979) in terms of using 75% success at the end of five years, less than 1/3 bone loss around the implant, movement of 1 mm or less in any direction, and no evidence of frank infection around the implant.…”

Section: Periodontitis Vs Peri-implantitismentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontitis vs. Peri-Implantitis: The Same Disease? The Same Treatment?

Meffert

1996

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:The microbial flora in the natural dentition sulcus/pocket and the implant crevice/pocket is very similar in both health and disease. In health, coccal forms predominate, and in disease, large numbers of Gram-negative pathogens are associated with both tooth and implant. It has also been demonstrated that the bacteria in the partially edentulous implant case may be more pathogenic (especially Gram-negative rods and spirochetes) than in the fully edentulous case, indicating a possible seeding mechanism from tooth pocket to implant crevice. Detoxification procedures involving the use of tetracycline and citric acid prior to regenerative procedures with the use of barrier membranes and grafting materials are necessary, and the same problems attendant to premature exposure of the barrier membrane(s) in the natural dentition situation apply to the implant case. It is apparent that periodontitis = peri-implantitis in etiology and therapy.

show abstract

Section: Periodontitis Vs Peri-implantitismentioning

confidence: 99%

Periodontitis vs. Peri-Implantitis: The Same Disease? The Same Treatment?

Meffert

1996

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Historically, there is another approach to the assessment of longitudinal bone change: that is, different criteria have been utilized to assess the success of implants based on radiographic appearance or measurement of distance. Schnitman and Shulman 22) recommended that bone loss was not greater than 1/3 of the implant length. Albrektsson et al 1) and Smith and Zarb …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability of Linear Distance Measurement for Dental Implant Length with Standardized Periapical Radiographs

Wakoh

Harada

Otonari

et al. 2006

Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of distance measurements of implant length based on periapical radiographs compared with that of other modalities. We carried out an experimental trial to compare precision in distance measurement. Dental implant fixtures were buried in the canine and first molar regions. These were then subjected to periapical (PE) radiography, panoramic (PA) radiography, conventional (CV) and medical computed (CT) tomography. The length of the implant fixture on each film was measured by nine observers and degree of precision was statistically analyzed. The precision of both PE radiographs and CT tomograms was closest at the highest level. Standardized PE radiography, in particular, was superior to CT tomography in the first molar region. This suggests that standardized PE radiographs should be utilized as a reliable modality for longitudinal and linear distance measurement, depending on implant length at local implantation site.

show abstract

“…Son yıllarda, implant mobilite miktarının belirlenmesinde belli bir kriterin geliştirilmesi için çalışmalar yapılmıştır. 30,31 Bazı araştırmacılar implantlardaki mobiliteyi belirlemek için değişik metodlar geliştirmeye çalışmışlardır. Ancak geliştirilen metodların birçoğu rutin klinik uygulamalarda kullanılacak kadar pratik değildir ve genellikle araştırmalarda kullanılmaktadır.…”

Section: Yerleştirme Torku Testiunclassified

The methods of dental implant stability measurement

Doğar¹,

Büyükdere²

2018

Yeditepe J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants

Cited by 148 publications

References 0 publications

Periodontitis vs. Peri-Implantitis: The Same Disease? The Same Treatment?

Periodontitis vs. Peri-Implantitis: The Same Disease? The Same Treatment?

Reliability of Linear Distance Measurement for Dental Implant Length with Standardized Periapical Radiographs

The methods of dental implant stability measurement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About