The January 2005 issue of the journal Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas included an original paper by J. Cubiella et al. on behalf of "Sociedad Gallega de Patología Digestiva" (SGPD) (1). The article reported the results of a study on the available sedation modalities, regular method of sedation, and sedation method desired by endoscopists at both public and private endoscopy units in Galicia. Participation in the study was 70%, and so results were considered representative for Galicia, with these being in addition comparable to those of a recent study carried out in Catalonia (2).That same issue of our Journal included an editorial by Dr. López-Timoneda and Dr. Ramírez-Armengol, from the departments of anesthesiology and endoscopy, respectively, at Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Madrid (3). Although no direct reference is made to the article by Cubiella et al., its content has raised great disquiet and unease among gastroenterology specialists in the Galician Community, as well as in SGPD itself. Statements are made on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy that are far from actual daily practice in our country and the international community; indeed, some of them are extremely serious, have potential medico-legal consequences, and may even raise alarm amongst the general population. In the authors' primary conclusion, they demand that "sedo-analgesia (conscious sedation) and deep sedation techniques be exclusively performed by professionals with appropriate qualifications and training for their diligent execution, which is only the case with physicians who are specialists in anesthesiology and resuscitation"; otherwise, they state that "a criminal deed of professional intrusion, as typified in Art. 403 under the criminal law in force" is committed (3).Although we must respect personal and institutional opinions that may be expressed on controversial areas in a scientific forum, those presented in the aforesaid editorial cannot be accepted as anything more than the authors' own opinion in contrast with criteria issued by scientific societies in our field. Of note, they left out recommendations by international societies of endoscopy and gastroenterology, and an attentive reading of their bibliographical references reveals that they even draw conclusion in opposition to those advocated for by their authors.Sedo-analgesia is an inseparable part of the endoscopic procedure itself. As a result, endoscopists have developed skills in administering a variety of sedative and analgesic agents to facilitate procedures and enhance patient comfort (4). Sedoanalgesia is carried out routinely in all endoscopic units under the responsibility of