2017
DOI: 10.1080/24705314.2017.1354154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for numerical modelling of concentrically braced steel frames with gusset plate connections subjected to earthquake ground motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modelling approach used here has been previously verified using the results of real-time fullscale shake table testing of single-storey CBFs carried out as part of the BRACED project [6]. Results from the experimental and numerical models were compared under the key criteria of frame acceleration, lateral drift and brace axial force [7]. The test frame set-up and sample comparison of the model and experimental responses are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modelling approach used here has been previously verified using the results of real-time fullscale shake table testing of single-storey CBFs carried out as part of the BRACED project [6]. Results from the experimental and numerical models were compared under the key criteria of frame acceleration, lateral drift and brace axial force [7]. The test frame set-up and sample comparison of the model and experimental responses are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we present a control method using diagonal-bracing friction damper system for NREL 5-MW OWT (Jonkman, Butterfield, Musial, & Scott, 2009). For earthquake analyses, OpenSees has been proved as one of the most effective software (Mazzoni, McKenna, Scott, & Fenves, 2007, Tran, Nguyen, & Kim, 2018Ryan, Broderick, Hunt, Goggins, & Salawdeh, 2017). For that reason, in this study, OpenSees is used to simulate two steel structures of the wind turbine as steel structures without and with friction dampers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major portion of these studies has focused mainly on the response of bracing members and their connections [3][4]. Extensive experimental [5][6][7] and numerical [8,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] investigations have also been undertaken to study the behavior of single-story and multi-story CBFs under severe loading scenarios, assessing both the system level and component level responses. In the United States, steel CBFs are designed according to the AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings [10], hereafter referred to as AISC360, as well as the special seismic design rules of the AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings [11], which is referred to here as AISC341.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%