1994
DOI: 10.1351/pac199466122527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for nomenclature of ionselective electrodes (IUPAC Recommendations 1994)

Abstract: Names of countries given after Members' names are in accordance with the IUPAC Handbook 1991-93; changes will be effected in the 1994-95 edition. ~Republication of this report is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgement, with full reference together with IUPAC copyright symbol (0 1994 IUPAC), is printed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
796
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,427 publications
(833 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
796
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrode developed in this laboratory is superior (especially concerning lifetime and simplicity) as compared with naproxenate ion selective electrodes described in the literature. 19,29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrode developed in this laboratory is superior (especially concerning lifetime and simplicity) as compared with naproxenate ion selective electrodes described in the literature. 19,29 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above calibration equation and the slope value (Table 1) show that the electrode provides a near-Nernstian response to the naproxenate ion in the range of 1.0 × 10 -2 to 5.0 × 10 -5 mol L -1 . The limit of detection, 29 as determined from the intersection of the two extrapolated segments of the calibration graph (Figure 2), was 3.9 × 10 -5 mol L -1 . The sensor response displayed good stability and repeatability over the tests; the last mentioned feature is illustrated by the standard deviation values shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Electrode Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 The response time of the electrode was tested by measuring the time required to achieve a steady state potential (within ± 0.2 mV min -1 ), for 1.0 × 10 -2 to 1.0 × 10 -6 mol L -1 NaFur solutions at pH 8.5. 53 The electrode yielded steady potentials within 10 to 15 s at high concentrations (≥ 1.0 × 10 -3 mol L -1 ) and about 20 s at concentrations near the detection limit. The experimental results show that the lifetime of the electrode was about 6 months, with a total of 620 determinations.…”
Section: Response Time and Lifetime Of The Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection limit, as determined from the intersection of the two extrapolated segments of the calibration graph (Figure 1), was 3.8 × 10 -7 mol L -1 . 53 The sensor response displayed good stability and repeatability over the tests; the last mentioned feature is illustrated by the standard deviation values shown in Table 2.For the reasons previously mentioned the Fur-sensitive electrode with composition of 50% (graphite, m/m) was chosen to perform all of the following studies. …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this work, the potential responses of the proposed Ag + membrane sensor to a wide variety of cations were investigated through the matched potential (MPM) 37 and separation solution method (SSM). 38 The resulting selectivity coefficient values obtained for the Ag + membrane electrode are summarized in Table 4. As it is seen, for alkali and alkali earth metal ions tested (Na + , K + , Ca 2+ ) the selectivity coefficients are less than 7.9 × 10 -6 .…”
Section: Evaluation Of Selectivity Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%