2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09838-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for evaluating the performance of background subtraction algorithms for surveillance systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm [35], we use a publicly available change detection dataset 2012 (CDnet 2012) [36] and 2014 dataset (CDnet 2014) [37]. As one of the most challenging detection benchmark dataset, the CDnet 2014 dataset is a second version of the CDnet 2012 dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed algorithm [35], we use a publicly available change detection dataset 2012 (CDnet 2012) [36] and 2014 dataset (CDnet 2014) [37]. As one of the most challenging detection benchmark dataset, the CDnet 2014 dataset is a second version of the CDnet 2012 dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive adjustment of the variation probability Pm uses the variation of two numbers generated by a random function, such as the variation of the time and teacher code in the schedule of a class. The performance of the genetic algorithm is affected by crossover and variation, and the magnitude of the adaptive variation probability is not a fixed value but varies with the crossover probability [20]. These two operations, adaptive crossover, and variation are coordinated with each other to ensure the global search ability of the genetic algorithm to obtain the global optimal solution.…”
Section: Figure 1 Improved Adaptive Genetic Algorithm Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%