The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for ecotoxicity testing with stygobiotic species in the framework of groundwater environmental risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, to date, ecotoxicological studies with N-compounds have been focused mainly on non-stygobiotic invertebrates, with the exception of the study carried out by [58], who analyzed the sensitivity of the stygobiotic cyclopoid Diacyclops belgicus (not found in VO_GWB) to ionized ammonium. The low number of ecotoxicological data concerning stygobiotic species, and the reasons behind the difficulty in carrying out such studies, have recently been reviewed by [72], who have also claimed as unrealistic the probability of gathering new data in the near future. Thus, the high taxonomic richness and abundances observed in VO_GWB will likely remain unsupported by ecotoxicological considerations for some more time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, to date, ecotoxicological studies with N-compounds have been focused mainly on non-stygobiotic invertebrates, with the exception of the study carried out by [58], who analyzed the sensitivity of the stygobiotic cyclopoid Diacyclops belgicus (not found in VO_GWB) to ionized ammonium. The low number of ecotoxicological data concerning stygobiotic species, and the reasons behind the difficulty in carrying out such studies, have recently been reviewed by [72], who have also claimed as unrealistic the probability of gathering new data in the near future. Thus, the high taxonomic richness and abundances observed in VO_GWB will likely remain unsupported by ecotoxicological considerations for some more time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hose et al [16] showed that the relative toxicities of As, Cr and Zn were consistent between 96 h, 14-day and 28-day exposures, but with up to a six-fold decrease in ECx values between 14 and 28 days. Di Lorenzo et al [10] recommend the reporting 96-h LCx values for the purposes of comparison between studies and the existing ecotoxicological databases, but recommend that tests be extended well beyond 96 h. Unfortunately, due to the longevity and low reproductive rates of stygobitic species, continuing tests for durations that are relevant to life cycles of the organisms tested may be difficult. For this reason, incipient LC50 values (sensu [45,46]) would be useful and should be a direction of future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicants were tested individually. Results from a test were not accepted if there was more than 20% mortality of organisms in control treatments [10].…”
Section: Water Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ecological Risk (ER) quantifies the probability that chemicals produced by human activity (hereafter referred as "pollutants") harm the health status of a biological community inhabiting an aquatic GDE [5,[25][26][27][28]. Since chemical pollutants usually occur in mixtures in GDEs, ER is quantified as in Equation (1) [29,30]:…”
Section: Section 1: Ecological Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%