1983
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(83)90550-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombination at semiconductor surfaces and interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
107
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This value is in a good agreement with the data published previously for n-GaAs(100) with similar doping level [24][25][26]. For the n-GaAs(100) surfaces treated with aqueous ((NH 4 ) 2 S + H 2 O) and alcoholic ((NH 4 ) 2 S + 2-C 3 H 7 OH) sulfide solutions the surface recombination velocity decreases to S = 1.25 × 10 5 cm/s and S = 6 × 10 4 cm/s, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2). This value is in a good agreement with the data published previously for n-GaAs(100) with similar doping level [24][25][26]. For the n-GaAs(100) surfaces treated with aqueous ((NH 4 ) 2 S + H 2 O) and alcoholic ((NH 4 ) 2 S + 2-C 3 H 7 OH) sulfide solutions the surface recombination velocity decreases to S = 1.25 × 10 5 cm/s and S = 6 × 10 4 cm/s, respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is well recognized that defect levels near mid-gap are the most effective nonradiative recombination centers, because they have a high probability of capturing both electrons and holes [10][11][12]. Therefore, the rapid irradiation-induced quenching of the PL intensity in GaAs, Ga 0.5 In 0.5 P, and Ga-rich In x Ga 1-x N can be attributed to the nonradiative recombination centers formed inside the bandgap by irradiation damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are analyzed using a new model which incorporates photovoltage, 10 surface recombination 18 and the energy dependence of the density of surface states 19 together with the bias dependence of the tunnel barrier height. 20 For a gold (non-magnetic) surface, the interpretation of the results is relatively simple as the density of empty states depends only weakly on energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%