2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-474-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant Reconstitution of Sumoylation Reactions In Vitro

Abstract: Reconstituting posttranslational modification with SUMO in vitro is an essential tool in the analysis of sumoylation. In this article, we provide detailed protocols that allow to set up and perform sumoylation reactions using a purified recombinant sumoylation machinery. The protocols include purification of the SUMO E1 enzyme His-Aos1/Uba2, untagged E2 enzyme Ubc9, untagged SUMO, and the RanBP2 E3 ligase fragment IR1 + M. Using these components, we provide step-by-step instructions to set up sumoylation react… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GST-RanGAP fragment 418–587 and GST-PML fragment 485–495 were purchased from Biomol International (Farmingdale, NY). MmUbc9 WT and K49R variant proteins were expressed and purified from the pET28a backbone as described earlier 63 . In vitro reactions were composed of 0.5 µM substrate (RanGAP, PML and E2–25K), 12.5 µM His 6 -SUMO3 Q92R, 65 nM SAE1/SAE2 and 0.5 µM wild type or K49R Ubc9 in activity buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 50 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GST-RanGAP fragment 418–587 and GST-PML fragment 485–495 were purchased from Biomol International (Farmingdale, NY). MmUbc9 WT and K49R variant proteins were expressed and purified from the pET28a backbone as described earlier 63 . In vitro reactions were composed of 0.5 µM substrate (RanGAP, PML and E2–25K), 12.5 µM His 6 -SUMO3 Q92R, 65 nM SAE1/SAE2 and 0.5 µM wild type or K49R Ubc9 in activity buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 50 mM NaCl and 1 mM DTT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant protein components of the SUMO conjugation machinery were produced in E. coli using pET28a-Aos1 (SAE1), pET28b-Uba2 (SAE2), pET23a-Ubc9, pET-11a-SUMO-1, and pET11-hRanGAP1, and were purified as previously described (25). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein levels were confirmed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. Pre-acetylated proteins were incorporated into in vitro SUMOylation assays with RanGAP1 substrate based on prior optimization studies; SAE1/SAE2 (140 ng), Ubc9 (220 ng), SUMO-1 (2 μg), RanGAP1 (2 μg, unacetylated) (27). Reaction buffer consisted of 40 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 220 mM KOAc, 4 mM Mg(OAc) 2 , 4 mM DTT, and protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enrichment of native endogenous SUMOylated proteins by cell fractionation is generally limited by the low abundance of such proteins and the action of efficient SUMO proteases [14]. In vitro modification of enriched target proteins with recombinant SUMOylation enzymes is a more promising approach, typically yielding mixtures of modified and unmodified target proteins contaminated with the SUMOylation enzymes, hence requiring subsequent purification steps [15], [16]. Also, co-expression of SUMO targets with SUMO1 and SUMO-activating and -conjugating enzymes of different origin (human, mouse, Xenopus laevis ) in E.coli was shown to produce SUMO-modified protein [17][19], but in our experience, the yields of specifically modified proteins were often poor, impeding efficient purification and subsequent biochemical analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%