2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris under glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter: From carbon source metabolism to bioreactor operation parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
1
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase GAP promoter (P GAP ), which is involved in a key step of the glycolysis pathway, was the first to emerge as a benchmark for efficient protein expression on various carbon sources. Thus, by avoiding all methanol‐related drawbacks, P GAP‐ based bioprocesses present relevant advantages for large‐scale production (Zhang et al , ; Ahmad et al , ; Çalık et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase GAP promoter (P GAP ), which is involved in a key step of the glycolysis pathway, was the first to emerge as a benchmark for efficient protein expression on various carbon sources. Thus, by avoiding all methanol‐related drawbacks, P GAP‐ based bioprocesses present relevant advantages for large‐scale production (Zhang et al , ; Ahmad et al , ; Çalık et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reflects the equilibrium between the various steps until the product is secreted, as a balance of the different processes involved during the protein synthesis, folding and secretion. This relationship is crucial to bioprocess development and optimization (Potvin et al , ; Looser et al , ; Çalik et al, ). Thus, Garcia‐Ortega et al () and Maurer et al () characterized P GAP ‐based strains producing an antibody fragment and obtained robust results with them in chemostat systems; so, they found q P to increase eight times with increasing μ. Rebnegger et al () examined the response of this expression system producing human serum albumin (HSA) at different specific growth rates at transcriptomic level and observed marked upregulation of genes involved in translation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that influence the expression level of the target peptide include inhibition of host growth by AMPs natural activities, AMP instability against bacterial and yeast proteases, and the inability to perform appropriate post-translational modifications (such as disulphide bonds) and produce recombinant proteins in the form of inactive inclusion bodies [14,15]. Furthermore, due to the requirement for fermentation, the large-scale production of AMPs in bacteria and yeast systems is limited, and the expensive downstream process significantly increases the production costs [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, substantial resources are applied to the development of recombinant protein production with P. pastoris (Calik et al 2015), the most widely used system as expression system for heterologous protein production (Gasser et al 2013). Purification of recombinant proteins, including cell lysis is commonly recognized among the most costly parts of entire production processes (Ernst et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%