2005
DOI: 10.1042/bj20051236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant prion protein does not possess SOD-1 activity

Abstract: A considerable body of evidence now shows that PrP (prion protein) binds metal ions with high affinity and it has been claimed that the binding of copper (II) ions to PrP confers SOD (superoxide dismutase) activity. In turn, it has been suggested that PrP is a synaptic dismutase and that loss of this function, as a result of the conversion of PrP(C) into PrP(Sc), results in pathology and hence morbidity associated with prion disease. However, contrary to previous reports, in the present study we have found tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
62
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, tissue cultures of nerve cells derived from the PrP C knockout mouse are less viable and more susceptible to oxidative damage and toxicity caused by agents such as copper and hydrogen peroxide than cells expressing wild-type PrP C (Brown et al, 1997a;Kuwahara et al, 1999). PrP C was hypothesized to act as an antioxidant (Brown and Besinger, 1998;Wong et al, 1999), but recent studies have established that PrP C has no superoxide dismutase activity either in vivo or in vitro (Hutter et al, 2003;Jones et al, 2005). Since numerous studies suggest that, under stress conditions, PrP C has a neuroprotective effect, this raises the question as to whether the neurodegenerative defects observed in scrapieinfected mice are aggravated by the loss of PrP C , as well as the build up of PrP Sc amyloid plaque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, tissue cultures of nerve cells derived from the PrP C knockout mouse are less viable and more susceptible to oxidative damage and toxicity caused by agents such as copper and hydrogen peroxide than cells expressing wild-type PrP C (Brown et al, 1997a;Kuwahara et al, 1999). PrP C was hypothesized to act as an antioxidant (Brown and Besinger, 1998;Wong et al, 1999), but recent studies have established that PrP C has no superoxide dismutase activity either in vivo or in vitro (Hutter et al, 2003;Jones et al, 2005). Since numerous studies suggest that, under stress conditions, PrP C has a neuroprotective effect, this raises the question as to whether the neurodegenerative defects observed in scrapieinfected mice are aggravated by the loss of PrP C , as well as the build up of PrP Sc amyloid plaque.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposed role for PrP is metal ion homeostasis (Brown, 2002;Watt and Hooper, 2003) because it binds copper avidly although its functional consequences, if any, are unclear (Davies and Brown, 2008). Other proposed roles for PrP include protection from oxidative stress (Brown, 2002;Krebs et al, 2007), although this is contentious (Hutter et al, 2003;Jones et al, 2005), and signal transduction (Rieger et al, 1997;Chiarini et al, 2002). In the brain, PrP particularly localizes to synaptic membranes (Herms et al, 1999;Fournier et al, 2000), suggesting a role in neurotransmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently of the impact of Cu/ZnSOD activity in ALS, we observed no significant changes in SOD activity by deletion of Prp, so we conclude like others 32 that Prp does not possess direct SOD activity or SOD regulating potency.…”
Section: G93amentioning
confidence: 53%