2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia patients complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation: retrospective analysis of outcomes between patients treated with heparin and recombinant human thrombomodulin therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DIC resolution rates on day 7 have been reported to be 40–60%, which is consistent with our results. The cumulative incidence of bleeding-related mortality tended to be lower in the SPI group than in the danaparoid group (3.3 vs. 6.6%); however, these incidences were lower than those in previous studies about UFH and LMWH (6.1–12.5%) [15, 22-23, 25]. In addition, most previous studies were retrospective studies in patients with different backgrounds, and therefore prospective studies are needed to evaluate the use of anticoagulants, including danaparoid and SPIs, for the treatment of DIC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…DIC resolution rates on day 7 have been reported to be 40–60%, which is consistent with our results. The cumulative incidence of bleeding-related mortality tended to be lower in the SPI group than in the danaparoid group (3.3 vs. 6.6%); however, these incidences were lower than those in previous studies about UFH and LMWH (6.1–12.5%) [15, 22-23, 25]. In addition, most previous studies were retrospective studies in patients with different backgrounds, and therefore prospective studies are needed to evaluate the use of anticoagulants, including danaparoid and SPIs, for the treatment of DIC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…OS in AML patients with DIC is significantly worse than that in AML patients without DIC. [ 29 ] Thus, in addition to controlling AML, successful treatment of DIC itself is indispensable for better clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 22 , 30 , 31 ] In the setting of hematologic malignancies, Takezako et al revealed that OS was superior in AML patients treated with rTM when compared with heparin. [ 29 ] Aota et al reported that there were no significant differences in the DIC resolution rates and mortality between the rTM (n = 21) and GM (n = 206) groups. [ 22 ] In the present study, rTM treatment could contribute to improved OS in non-APL AML patients compared with GM treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This novel agent seems to mediate fewer hemorrhagic side-effects than low-molecularweight heparin and improves overall survival. [20][21][22] Daily rTM from admission, however, failed to prevent severe epistaxis in the present young patient. Combination therapy using nafamostat mesilate or heparin and TXA may be dramatically effective for severe bleeding in patients with DIC and enhanced fibrinolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Recombinant thrombomodulin is generally recommended in DIC associated with adult AML. This novel agent seems to mediate fewer hemorrhagic side‐effects than low‐molecular‐weight heparin and improves overall survival . Daily rTM from admission, however, failed to prevent severe epistaxis in the present young patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%