1999
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.45.32387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant Human Aggrecan G1-G2 Exhibits Native Binding Properties and Substrate Specificity for Matrix Metalloproteinases and Aggrecanase

Abstract: A recombinant human aggrecan G1-G2 fragment comprising amino acids Val 1 -Arg 656 has been expressed in Sf21 cells using a baculovirus expression system. The recombinant G1-G2 (rG1-G2) was purified to homogeneity by hyaluronan-Sepharose affinity chromatography followed by high performance liquid chromatography gel filtration, and gave a single band of M r 90,000 -95,000 by silver stain or immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 1-C-6. The expressed G1-G2 bound to both hyaluronan and link protein indicating tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it has been widely accepted (22,23,30,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42) that ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) cleaves only at the Glu 373 -Ala 374 bond within the IGD, the results described here suggest that both of the major cleavages that are known to occur in vivo, at Glu 373 -Ala 374 and Asn 341 -Phe 342 , can be catalyzed by ADAMTS4. Previously, cleavage at the Asn 341 -Phe 342 site in the aggrecan IGD was considered a specific property of the MMP family, with the exception of a snake venom enzyme (30,34) 341 -Phe 342 bond in the experiments described here was due to contamination of the ADAMTS4 preparation with an MMP-like activity was eliminated by the observation that although 10 mM EDTA and TIMP-3 totally blocked the cleavage, neither TIMP-1 nor TIMP-2 was inhibitory, even at 750 nM. Collectively, these results suggest that the distinction between MMP, cathepsin B, and ADAMTS activities based on neoepitope immunoreactivity of the products can no longer be considered definitive (see Table I for summary).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although it has been widely accepted (22,23,30,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42) that ADAMTS4 (aggrecanase-1) cleaves only at the Glu 373 -Ala 374 bond within the IGD, the results described here suggest that both of the major cleavages that are known to occur in vivo, at Glu 373 -Ala 374 and Asn 341 -Phe 342 , can be catalyzed by ADAMTS4. Previously, cleavage at the Asn 341 -Phe 342 site in the aggrecan IGD was considered a specific property of the MMP family, with the exception of a snake venom enzyme (30,34) 341 -Phe 342 bond in the experiments described here was due to contamination of the ADAMTS4 preparation with an MMP-like activity was eliminated by the observation that although 10 mM EDTA and TIMP-3 totally blocked the cleavage, neither TIMP-1 nor TIMP-2 was inhibitory, even at 750 nM. Collectively, these results suggest that the distinction between MMP, cathepsin B, and ADAMTS activities based on neoepitope immunoreactivity of the products can no longer be considered definitive (see Table I for summary).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The ability of ADAMTS4 to cleave the Asn 341 -Phe 342 bond does not, however, appear to be sensitive to the presence or absence of keratan sulfate substitution because DIPEN 341 fragments were generated from both native aggrecan and non-glycosylated rG1-G2 substrate. This is in contrast to the snake venom reprolysin atrolysin C, which failed to cleave non-glycosylated rG1-G2 at the Asn 341 -Phe 342 site (30). Substrate specificity studies have suggested that ADAMTS enzymes associate with a region of aggrecan at or near the MMP cleavage site; however, this association was presumed to be more in the nature of a substrate-docking site for the enzyme (31,35 (48).…”
Section: -Phe 342 Site In Aggrecan 16064mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies comparing the presence or absence of endogenous keratan sulfate chains have suggested that aggrecanase cleavage in the IGD may be increased in the presence of keratan sulfate and reduced when keratan sulfate is enzymatically removed (36,37). However, recombinant substrates that lack keratan sulfate are not totally resistant to cleavage by aggrecanases (38,39). Collectively, these studies suggest that keratan sulfate in the IGD may influence aggrecanolysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%