Abstract:The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in our unit was 45% (86/190): there were 77 (40.5%) and 9 (4.7%) patients with previous and persistent HBV infection, respectively. Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was given to 118 chronic HD patients with a regimen of 3 double doses administered intramuscularly at 0, 1 and 2 months, obtaining a seroprotection rate of 67% (79/118), 57% (45/79) being high responders. At month 24, 78% (40/51) maintained protective levels of anti-HBs, 45% (18/40) of them being h… Show more
“…Identical results were obtained by Kovacic et al [34]. No link between seroresponse rate and rHuEPO therapy, as assessed by rate of rHuEPO administration between responder and non-responder patients, was noted after the HBV vaccine schedule in another cohort study [35]. Liu et al [36] observed an increment of anti-HBs titers between the initial month and the seventh month, related to rHuEPO dosage, in the control group only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Various approaches have been suggested in order to improve the response rate to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis populations including increased vaccine doses [35] or shots, or intradermal vaccine route [38,39]. Higher immunogenicity has been observed when HBV vaccine has been given to CKD patients not yet requiring regular dialysis [19].…”
<b><i>Background:</i></b> It is known that the immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine is lower in uremic patients than healthy subjects. Numerous inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this lowered response, and the high frequency of recombinant human erythropoietin use among patients on maintenance dialysis has been suggested to play a pivotal role. However, the impact of therapy with recombinant erythropoietin on the immune response to HBV vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not appropriately detailed. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> To evaluate the influence of human recombinant erythropoietin therapy on the immunological response to HBV vaccine in CKD patients by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We used the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. The end-point of interest was the rate of patients showing seroprotective anti-hepatitis B titers at completion of a hepatitis B vaccine schedule among human erythropoietin users versus those who did not receive the drug in a CKD population. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 11 studies involving 862 unique patients with CKD. Aggregation of study results did not show a significant increase in response rates among erythropoietin user versus non-user patients (pooled odds ratio = 1.431; 95% CI 0.954; 2.146), according to a random-effects model. No heterogeneity was found, the p value was 0.1 for our test of study heterogeneity (<i>Q</i> = 14.147). Stratified analysis in various subgroups of interest did not significantly change these findings. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our meta-analysis showed no link between immunological response to HBV vaccine and therapy with human recombinant erythropoietin among individuals on long-term dialysis. We suggest the use of recombinant vaccine towards hepatitis B in patients on regular dialysis irrespective of erythropoietin treatment.
“…Identical results were obtained by Kovacic et al [34]. No link between seroresponse rate and rHuEPO therapy, as assessed by rate of rHuEPO administration between responder and non-responder patients, was noted after the HBV vaccine schedule in another cohort study [35]. Liu et al [36] observed an increment of anti-HBs titers between the initial month and the seventh month, related to rHuEPO dosage, in the control group only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Various approaches have been suggested in order to improve the response rate to hepatitis B vaccine in dialysis populations including increased vaccine doses [35] or shots, or intradermal vaccine route [38,39]. Higher immunogenicity has been observed when HBV vaccine has been given to CKD patients not yet requiring regular dialysis [19].…”
<b><i>Background:</i></b> It is known that the immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine is lower in uremic patients than healthy subjects. Numerous inherited or acquired factors have been implicated in this lowered response, and the high frequency of recombinant human erythropoietin use among patients on maintenance dialysis has been suggested to play a pivotal role. However, the impact of therapy with recombinant erythropoietin on the immune response to HBV vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not appropriately detailed. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> To evaluate the influence of human recombinant erythropoietin therapy on the immunological response to HBV vaccine in CKD patients by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We used the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. The end-point of interest was the rate of patients showing seroprotective anti-hepatitis B titers at completion of a hepatitis B vaccine schedule among human erythropoietin users versus those who did not receive the drug in a CKD population. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We identified 11 studies involving 862 unique patients with CKD. Aggregation of study results did not show a significant increase in response rates among erythropoietin user versus non-user patients (pooled odds ratio = 1.431; 95% CI 0.954; 2.146), according to a random-effects model. No heterogeneity was found, the p value was 0.1 for our test of study heterogeneity (<i>Q</i> = 14.147). Stratified analysis in various subgroups of interest did not significantly change these findings. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our meta-analysis showed no link between immunological response to HBV vaccine and therapy with human recombinant erythropoietin among individuals on long-term dialysis. We suggest the use of recombinant vaccine towards hepatitis B in patients on regular dialysis irrespective of erythropoietin treatment.
“…They have lower seroprotection rates compared with healthy subjects; moreover, after completion of vaccination schedule anti-HBs titers of responder uraemic patients are low and decline logarithmically over time (1). Various approaches have been made to overcome the non-responsiveness of chronic uraemic patients including co-administration of adjuvants (8), or immune modulators (9), intradermal administration of HB vaccine (10), increased vaccine doses, or additional inoculations (11). Alternatively, it has been recommended to start vaccination in the early stages of a renal disease (12), when one could anticipate that the primary immune response is still satisfactory.…”
Context: The immunogenicity of the hepatitis B virus vaccine is reduced in patients with renal failure compared with the nonuraemic population. A variety of approaches have been suggested to improve the immune response in uraemic population including an increase in dose of the hepatitis B vaccine. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of hepatitis B vaccine schedules based on greater versus standard doses of HB vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3 -5. Evidence Acquisition: We carried out a systematic review of the medical literature with a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing seroprotection rates after greater vs. standard doses of the HB vaccine. The odds ratio to obtain seroprotection among patients who received greater (study group) vs. standard (control group) doses was the end-point of interest. We used a random-effects approach, as described by DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and subgroup analyses. Results: We retrieved 11 clinical trials (n = 870 unique patients); 2 (n = 141 patients) and 8 studies (n = 689) included CKD patients on pre-dialysis and dialysis stage, respectively. Three trials (n = 368 patients) employed plasma-derived vaccine; 8 (n = 502) adopted recombinant vaccine. Aggregation of study results (n = 10 studies) showed that the seroprotection rate (short-term follow-up) towards HB virus was higher among patients receiving greater than standard doses of vaccine [pooled OR, 2.10, 95% confidence intervals, 1.15 -3.82]. The P-value was 0.0001 for our test to study heterogeneity. The seroprotection rate towards HBV was much greater in the subset of trials (n = 2) based on plasma-derived vaccine (OR, 3.78; 95% CI, 2.35; 6.07), and no heterogeneity was found (NS). In the subset of RCTs (n = 8 studies), the seroprotection rate was higher among patients receiving greater doses of vaccine towards HBV, OR, 2.01 (95% CI, 0.92; 4.39), with significant heterogeneity (P = 0.002). Tolerance was satisfactory and no dropouts due to side effects were reported. Conclusions: Vaccine schedules based on greater than standard doses of HB vaccine offer higher immunogenicity in patients with chronic kidney disease. These results support the current recommendations to give higher doses of HBV vaccine to susceptible dialysis population in order to increase the sero-protection rate. Further research is needed to assess whether these findings apply to HB vaccines provided with novel adjuvants.
“…The standardized recommended (and even cost-effective) vaccination schedule for CKD or hemodialyzed patients consists of the intramuscular administration of 40 µg of recombinant vaccine (double the dose for the general population) at 0, 1, and 6 months [61]. The seroprotective titer of anti-HBs antibody is 10 IU/l.…”
Within the last few decades, the incidence and prevalence of both hepatitis B and C infections have decreased among kidney disease patients. Significant advances have been made in the prevention of hepatitis B and C virus transmission in these high-risk populations; however, the transmission risk is still not negligible. Viral hepatitis infections represent a significant problem among kidney disease patients; patients on regular dialysis, as well as renal transplant recipients (RTRs) due to their epidemiological, virological, and clinical features. Chronic hepatitis B and C have a strong impact on the clinical course of kidney disease as well as on the clinical course after kidney transplantation. The purpose of this review is to focus on the epidemiology, transmission modes, natural courses, and treatment options of hepatitis B and C infections in both chronic kidney disease patients and RTRs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.