2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.06.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant capripoxviruses expressing proteins of bluetongue virus: Evaluation of immune responses and protection in small ruminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inactivated vaccines have the associated disadvantages of needing larger doses to raise an immune response and the requirement for every batch to be tested to ensure complete inactivation of infectivity. Thus, a variety of alternate approaches have been undertaken to generate BTV vaccines, many of which have been tested in laboratory conditions with some level of success (1,13,14,21,30,32). In fact, our laboratory has demonstrated strong evidence supporting the VLPs as a good alternative to current vaccines (9,28,30,32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactivated vaccines have the associated disadvantages of needing larger doses to raise an immune response and the requirement for every batch to be tested to ensure complete inactivation of infectivity. Thus, a variety of alternate approaches have been undertaken to generate BTV vaccines, many of which have been tested in laboratory conditions with some level of success (1,13,14,21,30,32). In fact, our laboratory has demonstrated strong evidence supporting the VLPs as a good alternative to current vaccines (9,28,30,32,33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a canarypoxbased vector that expressed optimized synthetic genes for VP2 and VP5 (two injections, 22 days apart) elicited high levels of neutralizing antibodies, a differential reactivity to VP7 as compared to sera from infected sheep (DIVA), and strong protection against homologous challenge (BTV-17); such a non replicative canarypox vector is extensively and safely used over the world in other recombinant vaccines [10]. Finally, a replicative capripox encoding for VP2, VP7, NS1 and NS3 (one injection) was partially protective in sheep [78,99]. Thus, recombinant vectors can provide protective immunity with DIVA properties but their efficacy barely reaches that of inactivated vaccines, still requiring several injections for efficient long-term protection.…”
Section: Recombinant Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common immunogenic properties of these viruses have been used for the preparation of live attenuated vaccines that protect all ruminants against CaPV infection (Kitching et al, 1987). Recombinant CaPVs have also been developed for multivalent vaccination purposes (Berhe et al, 2003;Perrin et al, 2007;Romero et al, 1993;Wade-Evans et al, 1996;Wallace et al, 2006). However, although they are antigenically closely related, restriction enzyme pattern analysis, cross-hybridization studies and, more recently, nucleic acid sequencing have shown that nearly all CaPVs can be grouped according to their host origins Cao et al, 1995;Gershon & Black, 1988;Kitching et al, 1989;Tulman et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%