2012
DOI: 10.2165/11599490-000000000-00000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recombinant C1-Inhibitor

Abstract: Coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are activated in HAE patients suffering from an acute angioedema attack. Treatment with rhC1INH at 50 or 100 U/kg had no effect on parameters reflecting activation of these systems except for a significant effect on aPTT, which likely reflects a pharmacodynamic effect of rhC1INH, and a reduction on plasma levels of the prothrombin activation fragment F1+2. We conclude that these results argue against a prothrombotic effect of treatment with this rhC1INH product in HAE patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite such limitations, plasma D-dimers are regarded as useful laboratory markers for the diagnosis of thrombotic conditions ( 12 ). Our study corroborates other studies, which have suggested that, despite elevated plasma D-dimers at baseline and during attacks, C1-INH-HAE patients are not at increased thrombotic risk ( 24 , 25 , 27 ). This seemingly paradoxical situation, where activation of the contact coagulation (i.e., via Factor XI), kinin pathway, and fibrinolytic systems does not lead to increased thrombosis, is reconciled by the observation that while FXII-driven fibrin formation is important for pathologic thrombus formation, it has no important function in fibrin formation during normal hemostasis ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite such limitations, plasma D-dimers are regarded as useful laboratory markers for the diagnosis of thrombotic conditions ( 12 ). Our study corroborates other studies, which have suggested that, despite elevated plasma D-dimers at baseline and during attacks, C1-INH-HAE patients are not at increased thrombotic risk ( 24 , 25 , 27 ). This seemingly paradoxical situation, where activation of the contact coagulation (i.e., via Factor XI), kinin pathway, and fibrinolytic systems does not lead to increased thrombosis, is reconciled by the observation that while FXII-driven fibrin formation is important for pathologic thrombus formation, it has no important function in fibrin formation during normal hemostasis ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As recombinant C1INH (Ruconest®, rhC1INH) is the newest on the market, its potential thrombogenic risk was recently investigated by Relan et al ( 27 ). This study demonstrated that although coagulation and fibrinolysis pathways were indeed activated during acute attacks, treatment with rhC1INH had little or no effect on other coagulation markers, suggesting that it does not exert prothrombotic activity in vivo ( 16 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to other studies [5,7,13,16] with one exception, where the mean kaolin-cephalin clotting time (equivalent to APTT) was in the upper part of the RR for reasons unknown to us [14]. The majority of our patients with HAE-C1-INH type II and AAE-C1-INH had a shortened APTT, but only a few of those with HAE/AAE with a normal C1-INH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results demonstrated an activation of the kallikrein-kinin (contact) and the intrinsic coagulation system in patients with HAE-C1-INH. Similar results were obtained in other studies, including the formation of complexes of C1-INH with target proteases and an increased formation of thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes and prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, clinical studies with rhC1-INH have not suggested an increased risk of thromboembolic complications [ 36 40 ]. Post hoc analyses of the effects of rhC1-INH on coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with HAE who participated in the randomized, placebo-controlled North American study further supported that rhC1-INH treatment had no prothrombotic effects in patients with HAE receiving up to 100 U/kg [ 36 , 51 ].…”
Section: Safety and Tolerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%