2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.242301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoil Polarization Measurements of the Proton Electromagnetic Form Factor Ratio toQ2=8.5GeV2

Abstract: Among the most fundamental observables of nucleon structure, electromagnetic form factors are a crucial benchmark for modern calculations describing the strong interaction dynamics of the nucleon's quark constituents; indeed, recent proton data have attracted intense theoretical interest. In this Letter, we report new measurements of the proton electromagnetic form factor ratio using the recoil polarization method, at momentum transfers Q2=5.2, 6.7, and 8.5  GeV2. By extending the range of Q2 for which G(E)(p)… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
140
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally they have been extracted under the assumption of one-photon exchange via the Rosenbluth cross section in (4.40). It came as quite a surprise when the polarisation transfer measurements at Jefferson Lab revealed a ratio G p E /G p M that falls off and points towards a zero crossing at larger Q 2 [568][569][570][571], in stark contrast to the Rosenbluth measurements which had predicted a constant ratio. The question of the zero crossing for G p E is not yet settled because the experimental errors are still too large, but the situation is expected to change in the near future with the Jefferson Lab 12 GeV program where measurements in Halls A, B and C will extend the data range for G p E , G n E , and G n M up to the 10 -14 GeV 2 region [572].…”
Section: Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally they have been extracted under the assumption of one-photon exchange via the Rosenbluth cross section in (4.40). It came as quite a surprise when the polarisation transfer measurements at Jefferson Lab revealed a ratio G p E /G p M that falls off and points towards a zero crossing at larger Q 2 [568][569][570][571], in stark contrast to the Rosenbluth measurements which had predicted a constant ratio. The question of the zero crossing for G p E is not yet settled because the experimental errors are still too large, but the situation is expected to change in the near future with the Jefferson Lab 12 GeV program where measurements in Halls A, B and C will extend the data range for G p E , G n E , and G n M up to the 10 -14 GeV 2 region [572].…”
Section: Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this respect, new experiments with polarised beams and/or polarised targets performed at Jefferson Lab allowed to extract the ratio G E /G M directly. However, the resulting ratio disagrees with the scaling predictions and shows a falloff with t, even pointing towards a zero crossing at larger t [568][569][570][571].…”
Section: Overview Of Two-photon Physicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We demonstrate that application of the technique provides a dramatic improvement in On the left, the ratio G E /G M for the proton from application of the Feynman-Hellmann method, from a variational analysis of three-point functions, and from experiment [37,4,3]. On the right, the scaled pion form factor Q 2 F π from the Feynman-Hellmann technique and from experiment [7].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, measurements of the electric to magnetic form factor ratio of the proton, µ p G p E /G p M , using polarization techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] have shown a dramatic discrepancy at high four-momentum transfer, Q 2 , in comparison with the ratio obtained using the traditional Rosenbluth technique in unpolarized cross section measurements [14][15][16][17][18][19], highlighted in Fig. 1 by a selection of data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%