2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.84.443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoil-Ion Momentum Distributions for Single and Double Ionization of Helium in Strong Laser Fields

Abstract: We have measured the momentum distributions of singly and doubly charged helium ions created in the focus of 220 fs, 800 nm laser pulses at intensities of (2.9-6.6)x10(14) W/cm(2). All ions are emitted strongly aligned along the direction of polarization of the light. We find the typical momenta of the He2+ ions to be 5-10 times larger than those of the He1+ ions and a two peak structure at the highest intensity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
80
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
80
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar data have been published for He by Weber et al (2000) and Ar by Weber et al (2000a) and Feuerstein et al (2001). Note, in disagreement with Figures 15,16 , the momentum distribution for single ionisation displays a maximum at zero momentum.…”
Section: Double Ionisation: Non-sequential and Sequentialsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar data have been published for He by Weber et al (2000) and Ar by Weber et al (2000a) and Feuerstein et al (2001). Note, in disagreement with Figures 15,16 , the momentum distribution for single ionisation displays a maximum at zero momentum.…”
Section: Double Ionisation: Non-sequential and Sequentialsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This structure automatically ruled out "shake-off" (Fittinghoff et al 1992) or "collective tunnelling" (Eichmann et al 2000) as dominant NS double ionisation mechanisms terminating a ten years discussion. At the same time, the peaks were found to be compatible with the "antenna" (Kuchiev 1987) or the "recollision" mechanism (Corkum 1993) as was first shown within classical considerations Moshammer et al 2000;Weber et al 2000). Subsequently, a variety of theoretical predictions (see the detailed discussion and references in Dörner et al (2002)) based on S-matrix theory, on the numerical solution of the time dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) as well as on the classical or semi-classical approximations essentially established the double peakstructure and recollision as the dominant NS double ionisation mechanism (see also earlier measurements with circularly polarized light by Fittinghoff et al (1994) and Dietrich et al (1994)).…”
Section: Double Ionisation: Non-sequential and Sequentialsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The precise mechanism responsible for delayed double ionization, is still a subject of study from the theoretical and experimental points of view [9]. Experimentally, the signature of RESI can be found in momentum distributions: The two lateral peaks in the bimodal distribution are attributed to direct impact ionization whereas RESI contributes to the central part around zero ion momentum [4,5,[10][11][12]. It also turns out that direct impact ionization is expected to be triggered when the electric field is close to zero whereas RESI is expected when the electric field is maximum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is nonsequential double ionization, which can be observed for close-to-linearly polarized laser fields. In this process, a field-driven recollision of a tunnel ionizing electron is responsible for the knockout of the second electron [2][3][4]. This process can be efficiently controlled by manipulating the shape of a few-cycle laser field, using, e.g., the duration or carrier-envelope phase (CEP) of the pulse [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%