1991
DOI: 10.1080/02783199109553390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing creative thinking talent in the classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classic research work, Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students, Getzels and Jackson found only a modest correlation between creativity and IQ (Getzels & Jackson, 1962). Following up on this study, Carroll and Howieson (1991) investigated creativity and intelligence from the perspective of divergent production as being improved with training.…”
Section: Theories Of Creativitymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the classic research work, Creativity and Intelligence: Explorations with Gifted Students, Getzels and Jackson found only a modest correlation between creativity and IQ (Getzels & Jackson, 1962). Following up on this study, Carroll and Howieson (1991) investigated creativity and intelligence from the perspective of divergent production as being improved with training.…”
Section: Theories Of Creativitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One or two of these theories have been studied with elementary school students, mainly in western countries (Baer, 1996;Carroll & Howieson, 1991;Clark & Zimmerman, 1984). However, there have no studies that applied and examined the integration of all three theories for elementary school students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Intelligence test] and creative achievement in Milgram & Hong,199), a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = .00 was assumed (Rosenthal, 1991). Some of the previous studies were not used because they compared t-tests between high and low creative individuals (e.g., Carroll & Howieson, 1992;Getzels & Jackson, 1961;1962;Lynch, 1970); they presented comparisons between creative and control groups (e.g., Anastasi & Schaefer, 1971;Lang & Ryba, 1976); they reported multiple regression analysis for the prediction of IQ, creativity, leadership, and academic achievement (Chan, 2001) or the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students (SRBCSS, Chan, 2000); or they reported correlation coefficients within limited IQ ranges (Gonzales & Campos, 1997).…”
Section: The Correlation Coefficients Between Iq [Milta Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problems chosen in the second year were more inventive and richer in content. These observations seem to provide evidence to support the need to instruct and practice problem-finding skills early and often in school (Carroll & Howieson, 1991). …”
Section: Evaluation Of Discovery Center Unitmentioning
confidence: 78%