Recognizing changes in patient condition on a postsurgical unit

Michaels, Damon R.; Nelson, Donna; Card, Elizabeth; Jeskey, Mary; Lancaster, Leland J.; Berry, James M.

doi:10.1097/01.numa.0000345874.91694.86

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2011

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The RCT protocol (Michaels et al. 2009) involved a control (placebo)‐group of patients who wore the monitoring equipment but whose research nurses did not receive alerts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post-surgical units: managing technology implementation

Jeskey¹,

Card²,

Nelson³

et al. 2011

Journal of Nursing Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The RCT protocol (Michaels et al. 2009) involved a control (placebo)‐group of patients who wore the monitoring equipment but whose research nurses did not receive alerts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post-surgical units: managing technology implementation

Jeskey¹,

Card²,

Nelson³

et al. 2011

Journal of Nursing Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nursing attitudes towards continuous capnographic monitoring of floor patients

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionNurses’ perceptions of the utility of capnography monitoring are inconsistent in previous studies. We sought to outline the limitations of a uniform education effort in bringing about consistent views of capnography among nurses.MethodsA survey was administered to 22 nurses in three subacute care floors participating in a pragmatic clinical trial employing capnography monitoring in a large, urban tertiary care hospital. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the value and acceptance nurses ascribed to the practice. Means and SD were calculated for each response.ResultsSurvey results indicated inconsistency in the valuation of capnography, coupled with varying degrees of acceptance of its use. The mean for the level of perceived impact of capnography use on patient safety was 3.86, yet the perceived risk of removing capnography was represented by a mean of 2.57. The levels of urgency attached to apnoea alarms (mean 3.57, SD 1.57) were lower than those for alarms for oxygen saturation violations (mean 3.67, SD 1.32). The necessity for pulse oximetry monitoring was perceived as much higher than that for capnography monitoring (mean 1.76, SD 1.34), where ‘1’ represented pulse oximetry as more necessary and ‘5’ represented capnography as more necessary.ConclusionsNursing acceptance of capnography monitoring is a difficult endpoint to achieve. There is a need for better accounting for the external and internal influences on nurse perceptions and values to have greater success with the implementation of similar monitoring.

show abstract

Recognizing changes in patient condition on a postsurgical unit

Cited by 2 publications

References 1 publication

Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post-surgical units: managing technology implementation

Nurse adoption of continuous patient monitoring on acute post-surgical units: managing technology implementation

Nursing attitudes towards continuous capnographic monitoring of floor patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About