2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning 2010
DOI: 10.1109/devlrn.2010.5578868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing behaviors and the internal state of the participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in order to experimentally test whether the model-derived space can account for the perception of physical and social events, we need a large number of animations in which movements of simple shapes reflect a variety of complex events in both physical and social domains. Prior work has typically created such stimuli using manually-designed interactions (Gao et al, 2009(Gao et al, , 2010Gordon & Roemmele, 2014;Isik et al, 2017), simulations of rule-based behavior (Kerr & Cohen, 2010;Pantelis et al, 2014;Sano et al, 2020), or trajectories extracted from human activities in aerial videos (Shu et al, 2018). However, these methods of stimulus generation are unable to produce a large set of animations depicting rich behaviors and showing violations of physical and social constraints in a continuous and controlled manner.…”
Section: Continuous Spectrum Increasing Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in order to experimentally test whether the model-derived space can account for the perception of physical and social events, we need a large number of animations in which movements of simple shapes reflect a variety of complex events in both physical and social domains. Prior work has typically created such stimuli using manually-designed interactions (Gao et al, 2009(Gao et al, , 2010Gordon & Roemmele, 2014;Isik et al, 2017), simulations of rule-based behavior (Kerr & Cohen, 2010;Pantelis et al, 2014;Sano et al, 2020), or trajectories extracted from human activities in aerial videos (Shu et al, 2018). However, these methods of stimulus generation are unable to produce a large set of animations depicting rich behaviors and showing violations of physical and social constraints in a continuous and controlled manner.…”
Section: Continuous Spectrum Increasing Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior computational approaches to generating explanations using observed movements have focused on ascribing physical causes only (Forbus, Usher, Lovett, Lockwood, & Wetzel, 2008;Siskind, 2003) or have ascribed intentions such as "chasing" or "playing tag" that involve more than one agent (and thus are social). These intentions typically do not suggest the more socially sophisticated ability in which one agent factors the thoughts of another into its plans (Barrett et al, 2005;Blythe, Todd, & Miller, 1999;Crick & Scassellati, 2008;Kerr & Cohen, 2010;Young, Igarashi, & Sharlin, 2008).…”
Section: Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether with real robots such as Crick's, or in simulated worlds such as Kerr and Cohen's CAVE model [35], a fundamental question is how intentions develop within a cognitive architecture. Recently the development and use of intentions has been investigated by ontogenetic developmental robotic (DR) approaches.…”
Section: Intentions In Cognitive-social Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%