2010 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance 2010
DOI: 10.1109/avss.2010.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing and Localizing Individual Activities through Graph Matching

Abstract: In this paper we tackle the problem of detecting individual human actions in video sequences. While the most successful methods are based on local features, which proved that they can deal with changes in background, scale and illumination, most existing methods have two main shortcomings: first, they are mainly based on the individual power of spatio-temporal interest points (STIP), and therefore ignore the spatio-temporal relationships between them. Second, these methods mainly focus on direct classification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the current state of the art focuses on sparse local features like interest points and space-time interest points, as the work cited above, or on motion segmentation through background subtraction [20][21][22], dense optical flow [23] or other holistic features [24,25], with possible hybrid methods [26][27][28] and classification through dense matching [29,30]. Fully taking into account spatial relationships through graph matching has recently been proposed [31], but this requires matching against several graph models per action class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the current state of the art focuses on sparse local features like interest points and space-time interest points, as the work cited above, or on motion segmentation through background subtraction [20][21][22], dense optical flow [23] or other holistic features [24,25], with possible hybrid methods [26][27][28] and classification through dense matching [29,30]. Fully taking into account spatial relationships through graph matching has recently been proposed [31], but this requires matching against several graph models per action class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], human motion in each frame is represented by a graph and matching similarity is calculated between training and test data. Graph based techniques, such as Adaptive Graph Kernels (AGK) in [13], Kuhn -Munkres graph matching algorithm [21] and Dynamic Programing (DP) [22] are used for 3D human motion matching. Graph kernels have received extensive appreciation from researchers on 3D continuous data [23].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] matching is done via temporally ordered local feature-graphs where each graph models spatial configuration of the features in a small temporal segment. In [11], we introduced a representation of actions as graphs built on ST keypoints and proximity information. Given a model keypoint set and a scene keypoint set, a possible solution of the problem is given through the values of a set variables x i , where a value of x i =j is interpreted as model point i being assigned to scene point j.…”
Section: Keypoints and (Semi)-structured Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%