2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89639-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Ancient Coins Based on Local Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is of limited practical interest, its use being limited to such tasks as the identification of stolen coins or the detection of repeated entries in digital collections. Other works focus on coin type recognition, which is a far more difficult problem [7][8][9]. Most of these methods are local feature based, employing local feature descriptors such as SIFT [10] or SURF [11].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This problem is of limited practical interest, its use being limited to such tasks as the identification of stolen coins or the detection of repeated entries in digital collections. Other works focus on coin type recognition, which is a far more difficult problem [7][8][9]. Most of these methods are local feature based, employing local feature descriptors such as SIFT [10] or SURF [11].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, all work to date has been highly unstructured and ad hoc in its evaluation methodology. Some authors use data sets with coins in different conditions and unstated distributions thereof [9], and others very small data sets with coins in extremely rare, museum grade [8]. Hence the current understanding of different methods' behaviour is not very well understood at all.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first end-to-end coin recognition techniques for ancient coins was presented by Kampel and Zaharieva (Kampel and Zaharieva, 2008). In their work, various interest point detectors, local image descriptors and their combinations are tested for their applicability to image-based coin recognition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central contribution of his work is a novel feature type called locally-biased directional histogram that captures geometric relationships between interest points determined with the Difference-of-Gaussian detector (Lowe, 2004). Huber-Mörk et al (Huber-Mörk et al, 2011) presented an extension to the coin identification of Kampel and Zaharieva (Kampel and Zaharieva, 2008). A preselection step which analyzes the contour of the coin is introduced and allows for an efficient pruning of mismatching coins.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As image-based coin recognition has become an active research topic for recent decade, various algorithms based on training global features (Fukumi et al, 1992;Huber et al, 2005;Van Der Maaten and Poon, 2006;Reisert et al, 2007) or matching local features (Kampel and Zaharieva, 2008;Arandjelovic, 2010;Pan et al, 2014) have been proposed. At the beginning, studies were limited in classification of modern coins where legends were treated no differently as other patterns in relief.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%