2009
DOI: 10.4161/cib.2.3.7822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition without awareness in humans and its implications for animal models of episodic memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is just as important to refrain from assuming that tests intended to measure explicit memory necessarily do so, as overall performance can reflect combinations of both explicit and implicit memory processing. Premature assumptions based on an overemphasis on self-reported memory experiences have already generated considerable confusion in the memory literature (e.g., with respect to familiarity memory and implicit memory, as reviewed here, and with respect to the development of animal models of explicit memory, as suggested by Voss & Paller, 2009b). The reach of these missteps is being amplified as memory paradigms become increasingly important for mechanistic descriptions of more general psychological functions (e.g., Rosburg et al, 2011, as described above).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, it is just as important to refrain from assuming that tests intended to measure explicit memory necessarily do so, as overall performance can reflect combinations of both explicit and implicit memory processing. Premature assumptions based on an overemphasis on self-reported memory experiences have already generated considerable confusion in the memory literature (e.g., with respect to familiarity memory and implicit memory, as reviewed here, and with respect to the development of animal models of explicit memory, as suggested by Voss & Paller, 2009b). The reach of these missteps is being amplified as memory paradigms become increasingly important for mechanistic descriptions of more general psychological functions (e.g., Rosburg et al, 2011, as described above).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, it is just as important to refrain from assuming that tests intended to measure explicit memory necessarily do so, as overall performance can reflect combinations of both explicit and implicit memory processing. Premature assumptions based on an overemphasis on selfreported memory experiences have already generated considerable confusion in the memory literature (e.g., with respect to familiarity memory and implicit memory, as reviewed here, and with respect to the development of animal models of explicit memory, as suggested by Voss & Paller, 2009b). The reach of these missteps is being amplified as memory paradigms become increasingly important for mechanistic descriptions of more general psychological functions (e.g., Rosburg et al, 2011, as described above).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, Voss and Paller ( 2010 ) suggested that the relationship between recognition performance and explicit memory might not be so straightforward. Indeed, changes in strategy, based for example on encouragement to guess, can improve recognition performance, but these performance improvements do not always reflect conscious retrieval processes (Voss et al, 2008 ; Voss and Paller, 2009 , 2010 ). Another example can be seen in the change blindness effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%