1982
DOI: 10.1093/nar/10.8.2565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition sites of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I: DNA nucleotide sequencing analysis of topo I cleavage sites on SV40 DNA

Abstract: Eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I introduces transient single-stranded breaks on double-stranded DNA and spontaneously breaks down single-stranded DNA. The cleavage sites on both single and double-stranded SV40 DNA have been determined by DNA sequencing. Consistent with other reports, the eukaryotic enzymes, in contrast to prokaryotic type I topoisomerases, links to the 3'-end of the cleaved DNA and generates a free 5'-hydroxyl end on the other half of the broken DNA strand. Both human and calf enzymes cleave SV4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
59
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequence preferences (if any) for cleavage by DraTopIB are not yet known. It is conceivable that DraTopIB, similar to nuclear TopIB (64,65), is fairly promiscuous in DNA cleavage and might prefer to have a cleavage-ready active site in the free enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence preferences (if any) for cleavage by DraTopIB are not yet known. It is conceivable that DraTopIB, similar to nuclear TopIB (64,65), is fairly promiscuous in DNA cleavage and might prefer to have a cleavage-ready active site in the free enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The rat liver and other eucaryotic type I topoisomerases show a nonrandom pattern of cleavage (3), but cleavage and attachment apparently occur with all four types of nucleotide (3,11). Thus, it will be of interest to determine whether single base changes at the cytidine residues presumed to be the sites of FLP protein attachment to DNA (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in template preference may account for the finding that SS DNA is a more potent inhibitor of the bacterial relaxation activity than that of the eucaryotic enzyme (11). Studies of the cleavage of SS DNA using SS and gapped templates also indicate that the procaryotic and eucaryotic enzymes prefer quite different cleavage sites in terms of sequence and potential secondary structure (6,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). While the bacterial enzymes cleave at SS regions, the eucaryotic enzymes appear to seek regions of duplex structure (18), and hence during strand passage may be less adept at bridging the enzyme-induced break (5,6) than protein u (15,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%