2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60276-5_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition Performance of Selected Speech Recognition APIs – A Longitudinal Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To find the best cloud-based speech recognition service, Ingo Siegert et al [9] analyzed the performance of Google Speech API [19], IBM Watson [20], and Wit.ai [21] on German samples of high-quality spontaneous human-directed and devicedirected speech, as well as noisy device-directed speech, over an eight-month period. The experimental results [18] have shown that word error rate is quite low in Google Cloud Speech and Wit.ai with 7% to 8% absolute.…”
Section: Openvidu-call Jitsi Meet Bigbluebuttonmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To find the best cloud-based speech recognition service, Ingo Siegert et al [9] analyzed the performance of Google Speech API [19], IBM Watson [20], and Wit.ai [21] on German samples of high-quality spontaneous human-directed and devicedirected speech, as well as noisy device-directed speech, over an eight-month period. The experimental results [18] have shown that word error rate is quite low in Google Cloud Speech and Wit.ai with 7% to 8% absolute.…”
Section: Openvidu-call Jitsi Meet Bigbluebuttonmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Amazon Alexa API, Nuance Recognizer, Wit.ai, Houndify), some provide the possibility to use their speech recognition API also within personal products or with own speech files [18]. To find the best cloud-based speech recognition service, Ingo Siegert et al [9] analyzed the performance of Google Speech API [19], IBM Watson [20], and Wit.ai [21] on German samples of high-quality spontaneous human-directed and devicedirected speech, as well as noisy device-directed speech, over an eight-month period.…”
Section: Openvidu-call Jitsi Meet Bigbluebuttonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though in the following years, Hebrew ASR performance may have improved, we expect that the WER of Hebrew will still be higher than typical WERs of English. For German, Siegert et al (2020) reported 7% WER. Hence, we hypothesize: H1: A comparison of English, Hebrew, and German ASR would yield the highest performance for English, the lowest performance for Hebrew, and an in-between performance for German.…”
Section: Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this research is to explore ASR performance gaps by a comparative study of American English (henceforth, English), which is a high-resourced language, versus German and Hebrew as a mid-resourced and low-resourced language, respectively. Performance evaluation is a major issue in scientific research and technology development (NIST, 2009;Siegert et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%