“…have reported that this line can be identified in 74.4% of patients on MR imaging of the pelvis [1]. The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1]. The reasons for difficulty in identifying the anterior peritoneal reflection line included postoperative status, poor image quality, motion artifact, a paucity of pelvic fat planes, retroversion of the uterus and presence of a large, exophytic rectosigmoid tumor [1].…”
Section: Mass Localizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Gollub and al. have reported that this line can be identified in 74.4% of patients on MR imaging of the pelvis [1]. The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1].…”
Section: Mass Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1]. The reasons for difficulty in identifying the anterior peritoneal reflection line included postoperative status, poor image quality, motion artifact, a paucity of pelvic fat planes, retroversion of the uterus and presence of a large, exophytic rectosigmoid tumor [1]. The anterior peritoneal reflection line was particularly well seen in patients who had fluid in the pelvic cul-de-sac (Fig.…”
Pelvic extraperitoneal pelvic masses are relatively uncommon conditions and generally raise diagnostic imaging challenges. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of these masses due to its unique tissue-specific multiplanar capabilities that allow optimal pelvic mass localization and internal characterization. This article reviews the MR imaging presentation of extraperitoneal pelvic masses, gives clues that allow identifying their extraperitoneal and/or specific origin as well as suggests different steps for narrowing the differential diagnosis. These steps include systematic analysis of the clinical context, tumor location, relationships with major pelvic structures and close study of the internal components of the lesions.
“…have reported that this line can be identified in 74.4% of patients on MR imaging of the pelvis [1]. The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1]. The reasons for difficulty in identifying the anterior peritoneal reflection line included postoperative status, poor image quality, motion artifact, a paucity of pelvic fat planes, retroversion of the uterus and presence of a large, exophytic rectosigmoid tumor [1].…”
Section: Mass Localizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Gollub and al. have reported that this line can be identified in 74.4% of patients on MR imaging of the pelvis [1]. The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1].…”
Section: Mass Localizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The tip of the seminal vesicles in men and the uterocervical angle in women were constant landmarks to determine the location of the most inferior point of the peritoneal membrane [1]. The reasons for difficulty in identifying the anterior peritoneal reflection line included postoperative status, poor image quality, motion artifact, a paucity of pelvic fat planes, retroversion of the uterus and presence of a large, exophytic rectosigmoid tumor [1]. The anterior peritoneal reflection line was particularly well seen in patients who had fluid in the pelvic cul-de-sac (Fig.…”
Pelvic extraperitoneal pelvic masses are relatively uncommon conditions and generally raise diagnostic imaging challenges. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of these masses due to its unique tissue-specific multiplanar capabilities that allow optimal pelvic mass localization and internal characterization. This article reviews the MR imaging presentation of extraperitoneal pelvic masses, gives clues that allow identifying their extraperitoneal and/or specific origin as well as suggests different steps for narrowing the differential diagnosis. These steps include systematic analysis of the clinical context, tumor location, relationships with major pelvic structures and close study of the internal components of the lesions.
“…Identification of the anterior peritoneal reflection can be challenging and is best assessed on both axial and sagittal T2 images. In the mid- distance from the anorectal junction to the anterior peritoneal reflection, as measured in a straight line on a sagittal image was 6.7-6.9 cm in a published series [23]. Figure 6 shows examples of the anterior peritoneal reflection in the female and male pelvis on sagittal T2 images.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Anterior Peritoneal Reflectionmentioning
MRI is crucial for local staging of rectal cancer. A standardized approach to reporting of rectal MRI focused on communication of essential treatment planning and prognostic indicators ensures maximal added value to referring physicians to guide appropriate management.
“…It offers several theoretical advantages over EUS as it reveals a larger field of view and permits the study of stenotic, nontraversable tumors [18,40,41]. Recently, the identification of the anterior peritoneal reflection on MRI in 74 % of patients in one study is important given the impact of this landmark on surgical planning [42]. A meta-analysis of 90 articles (1995-2002) compared the utility of MRI, radial EUS without FNA, and CT for staging with histopathology correlation as the gold standard and came to the following conclusions: For T1/T2 lesions, EUS and MRI had similar sensitivity, but specificity was higher in EUS (86 vs. 69 %); for T3 tumors, the sensitivity of EUS was significantly higher than that of MRI or CT [43].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.