Recognition of risk and prevention in safeguarding of children and young people: a mapping review and component analysis of service development interventions aimed at health and social care professionals

Abstract

Background The term ‘safeguarding’ covers the protection of health, wellbeing and human rights. Effective safeguarding enables people (particularly children, young adults and other vulnerable people) to live free from fear of abuse, harm or neglect. The UK Children Act 2004 required key agencies, including health and social care providers, to consider the need to safeguard children and promote their welfare. Within a larger evidence synthesis project, we sought to identify and map service development interventions (excluding provision of training) aimed at improving awareness of safeguarding and identifying at-risk children and young people in health and social care settings. Methods We searched fourteen health and social care databases from 2004 (date of Children Act) to October 2019 and updated the review via a citation search in March 2021. Studies of any design were eligible if they described or evaluated an intervention (other than training) aimed at health or social care professionals in the United Kingdom and designed to improve recognition of risk in the context of safeguarding children and young people. Studies with no intervention (e.g. qualitative studies) were included to explain why interventions work or fail to work. Included studies were summarised using narrative synthesis. Risk of bias of included studies and overall strength of evidence were assessed using standard methods. We used a 5-item checklist (“TIDieR-Lite”) to map intervention components. Results Thirty-nine publications were included, of which 31 dealt with service developments, six with use of data and two with other initiatives. Promising service development initiatives include liaison nurses, assessment clinics, secondment, joint protocols and a ‘hub and spoke’ model. Initiatives involving use of routine data appeared promising and unlikely to generate significant additional costs. However, the quality of the evidence was generally low, with a shortage of controlled and long-term studies. Conclusions Health and social care services wishing to improve awareness of child safeguarding issues may benefit from looking beyond high-quality training provision. Future research should focus on service-relevant outcomes and ensure the active involvement of young people and their families/carers.

Factors Influencing Clinicians', Health Visitors' and Social Workers' Professional Judgements, Decision‐Making and Multidisciplinary Collaboration When Safeguarding Children with Burn Injuries: A Qualitative Study

“…In addition, SWs could be embedded in ED departments to work directly with health colleagues, and a trial conducted to evaluate effectiveness. A recent mapping review suggested that health and social care services aiming to improve awareness of safeguarding issues may benefit from service development interventions that go beyond high‐quality training provision (Chambers et al, 2021). Another recent study found that the implementation of a multidisciplinary model whereby all paediatric burns were evaluated by an internal child protection team may provide a more consistent and reliable method of identifying abuse cases (Nigro et al, 2018).…”

Safeguarding in practice: anticipating, minimising and mitigating risk in teenage pregnancy research in urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya

“…Safeguarding is a priority in global health research and development and includes protection from sexual abuse and exploitation, physical and psychological abuse, financial exploitation, bullying and neglect 1. We define safeguarding as measures to prevent and protect people’s (participants, communities and research staff) health, well-being and rights, including those who may be vulnerable and at risk of abuse due to the actions (or inactions) of another person(s) and or organisation(s) 1 2. There is very little safeguarding literature from low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) and no practical examples to help people interpret the guidelines in context.…”

The Leadership Practices of Nurses in the New Zealand Hospital Ward: A Focused Ethnography

“…Safeguarding is not a term commonly connected with leadership practices. Safeguarding is usually associated with the protection of children and young people, and vulnerable adults, to keep them safe from harm or potential abuse (Brown, 1992;Chambers et al, 2021). Safeguarding has been associated with safety culture in complex contexts to protect patients (Farag et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2019;McKeon et al, 2006) and increasingly with nursing.…”