1995
DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4190-4193.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of nitrogen-responsive upstream activation sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the product of the GLN3 gene

Abstract: We describe the purification of the product of the GLN3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the demonstration that the purified product, Gln3p, binds specifically to the DNA sequences GATAAG and GATTAG, previously identified as nitrogen-responsive upstream activation sequences (UAS N ). When Gln3p is overproduced, it is released from the cells in a highly aggregated form incapable of specific binding to UAS N . We used Gln3p tagged with six histidine codons at the 5 terminus and equipped with a galactose-indu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
3
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Why did Gln3 constitutively localize to the nucleus when residues 336-345 were abolished but did not behave similarly in the three substitution mutants we constructed, in particular, 332dddd Gln3-Myc 13 (pRR787)? To address this question, we looked in detail at the amino acid sequence around Gln3 residues 336-345 and discovered that they were immediately adjacent to the Gln3 zinc finger motif responsible for Gln3 binding to its target GATA elements in NCR-sensitive gene promoters Rai et al 1989;Bysani et al 1991;Blinder and Magasanik 1995;Cunningham et al 1996;Stanbrough and Magasanik 1996). This entire region of Gln3, residues 306-357, is highly conserved in both closely and more distantly related yeasts ( Figure 8A).…”
Section: Identification Of a Gln3 Sequence With The Characteristics Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why did Gln3 constitutively localize to the nucleus when residues 336-345 were abolished but did not behave similarly in the three substitution mutants we constructed, in particular, 332dddd Gln3-Myc 13 (pRR787)? To address this question, we looked in detail at the amino acid sequence around Gln3 residues 336-345 and discovered that they were immediately adjacent to the Gln3 zinc finger motif responsible for Gln3 binding to its target GATA elements in NCR-sensitive gene promoters Rai et al 1989;Bysani et al 1991;Blinder and Magasanik 1995;Cunningham et al 1996;Stanbrough and Magasanik 1996). This entire region of Gln3, residues 306-357, is highly conserved in both closely and more distantly related yeasts ( Figure 8A).…”
Section: Identification Of a Gln3 Sequence With The Characteristics Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-4 for reviews of the field). When nitrogen availability limits growth, as occurs with poor nitrogen sources such as proline, Gln3p and/or Gat1p bind to the GATA sequences upstream of NCR-sensitive genes and activate their transcription (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). However, in nitrogen excess, the GATA sites are unoccupied because Gln3p and Gat1p are excluded from the nucleus (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in the presence of high-quality nitrogen sources such as glutamine, a decrease in the levels of catabolic enzymes is observed. The reduced expression of the genes coding for enzymes involved in the utilization of poor nitrogen sources is brought about through the action of a regulatory system known as nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) (Blinder & Magasanik, 1995;Coffman et al, 1995Coffman et al, , 1996Courchesne & Magasanik, 1988;Minehart & Magasanik, 1991) NCR operates through the action of two transcriptional activators, Gln3 and Nil1/ Gat1, and two repressors, Dal80 and Gzf3/Deh1/Nil2 (Minehart & Magasanik, 1991;Stanbrough et al, 1995;Svetlov & Cooper, 1998;Magasanik & Kaiser, 2002), whose expression is regulated by nitrogen levels. In the presence of repressive nitrogen sources, the TOR signalling pathway promotes the association of the GATA transcription factors Gln3 and Gat1 with the cytoplasmic protein Ure2, thus retaining Gln3 and Gat1 in the cytoplasm (Beck & Hall, 1999;Cardenas et al, 1999;Hardwick et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%